Rosenverse
Building Trust Through Equitable Research Practices

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Building Trust Through Equitable Research Practices

Gold
Friday, November 18, 2022 • Civic Design 2022
Share the love for this talk
Building Trust Through Equitable Research Practices
Speakers: Lisa Spitz and Nikki Brand
Link:

Summary

User research helps you engage the people who will use the service you’re building, increasing the likelihood that you’ll create something that truly meets peoples’ needs. But equitable recruitment—ensuring that you’re engaging users from all walks of life—can be difficult to achieve.

Traditional user research practices often exclude people like those who don’t have access to the internet or can’t take time off work, but who might most need to access a service. While there is no one-size-fits-all solution for promoting equitable research, we aim to share inclusive and respectful research practices that foster trust with research participants and government stakeholders.

Attendees will gain an understanding of Nava's approach to conducting user research, lessons learned, best practices, and how our work contributes to more equitable access to public services for millions of people and vulnerable populations across the country. Participants will hear examples from Nava's research and walk away with concrete practices they can implement in their work.

Key Insights

  • •

    Nava deliberately shifts recruitment focus from a homogenous group to underrepresented communities to ensure equitable user research.

  • •

    Building trust with government partners starts early through collaboration on research planning, including co-creating research briefs and interview guides.

  • •

    Providing detailed interview guides to stakeholders increases transparency and helps build trust in the research process.

  • •

    Remote user research conducted since 2020 offers greater scheduling flexibility and participation diversity but also has limitations.

  • •

    Plain language consent forms improve participant understanding and respect during research sessions.

  • •

    Active listening and reiterating stakeholder feedback throughout the process prevents misalignment and loss of trust.

  • •

    Nava fosters capacity building by enabling government stakeholders to shadow, conduct, and synthesize research themselves for long-term independence.

  • •

    Tracking and analyzing diversity metrics across studies on a quarterly basis helps identify recruitment gaps and informs ongoing improvements.

  • •

    Recruitment challenges persist for certain groups like Hispanic/Latino origin, older adults, and lower income participants despite varied outreach methods.

  • •

    Collaborations with community-based organizations are critical to accessing vulnerable or hard-to-reach populations and supporting non-English speakers.

Notable Quotes

"Bringing our government Partners in early as collaborators and making a clear case for the value of research is one way that we build trust with our stakeholders."

"Every single thing that we would plan to say to the participant is spelled out in this interview guide to build transparency and trust."

"We prioritize speaking with people who are most in need of support so we can better understand and design for all potential users of PFML."

"Since March 2020, we’ve actually conducted all of our interviews remotely, which generally makes scheduling with diverse groups easier."

"Participants can skip any questions they don’t feel comfortable answering; most demographic questions are optional to respect privacy."

"We actively coach Department of PFML staff to shadow and eventually run their own research sessions so they’re empowered long-term."

"We use a participant matrix and assign pseudonyms to protect personally identifiable information throughout research."

"We constantly analyze our recruitment data and note that we still struggle to reach Hispanic or Latino origin individuals, older adults, and lower-income participants."

"Conducting retrospectives on research processes helps us identify bias, recruitment challenges, and improve methodology continuously."

"Being transparent and walking stakeholders through our process creates moments for reflection and keeps the whole team aligned."

Ask the Rosenbot
Louis Rosenfeld
About the Rosenverse
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Maria Giudice
Remaking the Making Company: Moving from Product to Experience
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Peter Van Dijck
Building impactful AI products for design and product leaders, Part 2: Evals are your moat
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Jackie Ajoux
Leveling-Up: A Single-Player’s Guide to the DesignOps Team-of-One
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Bud Caddell
Theme 2 Intro
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Amy Jiménez Márquez
The Atypical UX Manager Path
2020 • Enterprise Community
Ignacio Martinez
Fair and Effective Designer Evaluation
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Sam Ladner
How Research Can Drive Strategic Foresight
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Jon Fukuda
Theme One Intro
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Patrick Boehler
Fishing for Real Needs: Reimagining Journalism Needs with AI
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Ashley Sewall
Exit Interview #5: Designing My Life After Tech
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Brennan Hartich
Communicating and Establishing DesignOps as a New Function
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Uday Gajendar
Theme Four Intro
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Shan Shen
Translating UX Terms into Business Contexts
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold
Maish Nichani
Sparking a Service Excellence Mindset at a Government Agency
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Kit Unger
Theme 1 Intro
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold

More Videos

Mark Interrante

"Prioritization work is a political process, and politics are hard to do in technology."

Mark Interrante Harry Max

AI for Prioritization (3rd of 3 seminars)

July 11, 2024

Patrizia Bertini

"Compliance is everyone's concern but no one's responsibility."

Patrizia Bertini

The (r)evolution of designOps: It’s Time to Think (really) BIG

September 11, 2025

Shan Shen

"Sometimes you have to insist on the correct terms that are widely recognized and consistently used."

Shan Shen

Translating UX Terms into Business Contexts

November 29, 2023

Adam Thomas

"Trust is built by recognizing excellence, inducing challenge stress, giving discretion, and showing vulnerability."

Adam Thomas

Survival Metrics – Making Change in a Fast, Data-Informed, and Politically Safe Way

December 6, 2022

Robin Beers

"Ubuntu means I am because we are — we don’t really know our own humaneness unless it’s in relationship to other people."

Robin Beers

Research as a Catalyst for Organizational Transformation

March 12, 2021

Sheri Byrne-Haber

"If you’re rewarding designers for delivering on time, great, but if you reward them for delivering accessible products on time, you’ll get better results."

Sheri Byrne-Haber

Accessibility at Scale

June 9, 2021

Joseph Meersman

"Playbacks are stakeholder-focused meetings that sell the work’s story and drive buy-in, different from critiques focused on craft."

Joseph Meersman

Sweating the Pixel: Scaling Quality through Critique

June 10, 2021

Deanna Washington

"I’m still early on in measuring accessibility impact but tying early bug fixes to ROI is promising."

Deanna Washington Bria Alexander Jon Fukuda Saara Kamppari-Miller Farid Sabitov

Connecting the Ops: Plenary Panel and Closing Circle

September 9, 2022

Aaron Stienstra

"Iterative engagement models mean we test, learn, and adapt rather than seeking a perfect solution from the start."

Aaron Stienstra Lashanda Hodge

Leveraging Civic Design to Advance Equity and Rebuild Trust in the US Federal Government

December 8, 2021