Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Building Trust Through Equitable Research Practices

Gold
Friday, November 18, 2022 • Civic Design 2022
Share the love for this talk
Building Trust Through Equitable Research Practices
Speakers: Lisa Spitz and Nikki Brand
Link:

Summary

User research helps you engage the people who will use the service you’re building, increasing the likelihood that you’ll create something that truly meets peoples’ needs. But equitable recruitment—ensuring that you’re engaging users from all walks of life—can be difficult to achieve. Traditional user research practices often exclude people like those who don’t have access to the internet or can’t take time off work, but who might most need to access a service. While there is no one-size-fits-all solution for promoting equitable research, we aim to share inclusive and respectful research practices that foster trust with research participants and government stakeholders. Attendees will gain an understanding of Nava's approach to conducting user research, lessons learned, best practices, and how our work contributes to more equitable access to public services for millions of people and vulnerable populations across the country. Participants will hear examples from Nava's research and walk away with concrete practices they can implement in their work.

Key Insights

  • Nava deliberately shifts recruitment focus from a homogenous group to underrepresented communities to ensure equitable user research.

  • Building trust with government partners starts early through collaboration on research planning, including co-creating research briefs and interview guides.

  • Providing detailed interview guides to stakeholders increases transparency and helps build trust in the research process.

  • Remote user research conducted since 2020 offers greater scheduling flexibility and participation diversity but also has limitations.

  • Plain language consent forms improve participant understanding and respect during research sessions.

  • Active listening and reiterating stakeholder feedback throughout the process prevents misalignment and loss of trust.

  • Nava fosters capacity building by enabling government stakeholders to shadow, conduct, and synthesize research themselves for long-term independence.

  • Tracking and analyzing diversity metrics across studies on a quarterly basis helps identify recruitment gaps and informs ongoing improvements.

  • Recruitment challenges persist for certain groups like Hispanic/Latino origin, older adults, and lower income participants despite varied outreach methods.

  • Collaborations with community-based organizations are critical to accessing vulnerable or hard-to-reach populations and supporting non-English speakers.

Notable Quotes

"Bringing our government Partners in early as collaborators and making a clear case for the value of research is one way that we build trust with our stakeholders."

"Every single thing that we would plan to say to the participant is spelled out in this interview guide to build transparency and trust."

"We prioritize speaking with people who are most in need of support so we can better understand and design for all potential users of PFML."

"Since March 2020, we’ve actually conducted all of our interviews remotely, which generally makes scheduling with diverse groups easier."

"Participants can skip any questions they don’t feel comfortable answering; most demographic questions are optional to respect privacy."

"We actively coach Department of PFML staff to shadow and eventually run their own research sessions so they’re empowered long-term."

"We use a participant matrix and assign pseudonyms to protect personally identifiable information throughout research."

"We constantly analyze our recruitment data and note that we still struggle to reach Hispanic or Latino origin individuals, older adults, and lower-income participants."

"Conducting retrospectives on research processes helps us identify bias, recruitment challenges, and improve methodology continuously."

"Being transparent and walking stakeholders through our process creates moments for reflection and keeps the whole team aligned."

Ask the Rosenbot
Louis Rosenfeld
Founder’s Welcome
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold
Cennydd Bowles
Exit Interview #2: Rediscovering the ethical heart of design
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Jason Mesut
Shaping design, designers and teams
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Deirdre Hirschtritt
Research is Only as Good as the Relationships You Build
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Dawn Ressel
Full-Stack User Experiences: A Marriage of Design and Technology
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Leisa Reichelt
The Five Dysfunctions of Democratized Research at Scale
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
George Abraham
Design Systems To-Go: Indigo.Design Overview and Exploring the Developer Workflow (Part 3)
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Maria Skaaden
Continuous Design: One eye on the horizon and the other on the next wave
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Gregg Bernstein
Opportunistic Research with Gregg Bernstein
2019 • Advancing Research Community
Dave Hora
Advice for Establishing Research
2022 • Advancing Research Community
Nathan Reiff
Research, from Unimaginable to Presently Possible: A Future-Casting Sticky-Note Sprint
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Conference
Toby Haug
Discussion
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Erin May
Distributed, Democratized, Decentralized: Finding a Research Model to Support Your Org
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Christian Crumlish
Afternoon Insights Panel
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold
Ren Pope
Building Experiences for Knowledge Systems
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Daniel J. Rosenberg
Designing with and for Artificial Intelligence
2022 • Enterprise Community

More Videos

Daniel Gloyd

"Meisner taught actors to respond truthfully in the moment, prioritizing presence over preconceived ideas."

Daniel Gloyd

Designing From the Inside Out: How Method Acting Can Inspire Design Research

February 12, 2026

Deirdre Hirschtritt

"Butter is about consistently showing up and being present so people don’t forget you."

Deirdre Hirschtritt Cesar Paredes Marie Perrot

Research is Only as Good as the Relationships You Build

November 17, 2022

Benjamin Real

"I believe that maturity models could help define the strategy of the design team."

Benjamin Real

Maturity Models: A Core Tool for Creating a DesignOps Strategy

October 1, 2021

Max Gadney

"I always see interviews as a two-way conversation where I’m interviewing them as much as they’re interviewing me."

Max Gadney Andrea Petrucci Joshua Stehr Hannah Wickes

Assessing UX jobs for impact in climate

August 14, 2024

Lada Gorlenko

"Ivana will teach you how to scale fast and big from day one through product operations."

Lada Gorlenko

Theme 1: Intro

January 8, 2024

Feyikemi Akinwolemiwa

"I asked myself, will I take the leap or will I take permission? And this gamble paid off."

Feyikemi Akinwolemiwa

Play to innovate: How curiosity and experimentation transform UX

March 11, 2026

Bria Alexander

"If you have a question at the end of a presentation, please put that question in the thread associated with the talk."

Bria Alexander

Opening Remarks

March 29, 2023

Llewyn Paine

"Blurring user faces loses context and doesn’t address voice privacy, making it an inadequate solution."

Llewyn Paine

[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings

June 5, 2024

Bria Alexander

"Language matters—make your OKRs user-centric and customer-focused to avoid them feeling like overhead."

Bria Alexander Benson Low Natalya Pemberton Stephanie Goldthorpe

OKRs—Helpful or Harmful?

January 20, 2022