How Your Organization's Generative Workshops Are Probably Going Wrong and How to Get Them Right
Summary
Contrary to popular belief, a design sprint is a highly structured and carefully designed series of exercises, not a brainstorm, design jam or free-for-all. The whole point is to drive a cross-functional team to the right outcome, and this requires a set of structured exercises which weave the thread of user needs, behaviors and attitudes throughout. This involves more than reviewing the research at the start and then moving on to create without that research in context.
A true design sprint takes us from user insights -- even broad user insights -- to user-evaluated concepts or designs. The generative phase of a product is deeply impactful, and design sprints are a fantastic tool for driving this needed impact. However, many are practicing brainstorms or design jams rather than true design sprints. One can make a mismatched concept extremely usable throughout the product development process, but that will not remedy the fact that it is not the right concept.
Researchers are ideal design sprint organizers and facilitators, but researchers are sometimes not even considered a critical component of the sprint. It's important for knowledgeable researchers to drive design sprint impact.
Key Insights
-
•
Many generative workshops fail due to fundamental mistakes more often than they succeed.
-
•
The 'Sprint as theater' mistake occurs when workshops are done for appearances or political reasons rather than genuine product development.
-
•
Well-structured workshops with specific exercises are crucial to move from research data to human-centered product concepts.
-
•
Integrating research both before and after a workshop grounds concepts in real human needs and allows recovery if initial research is missing.
-
•
Excluding key decision-makers leads to surprise blockers after workshops and risks misalignment with product goals.
-
•
Facilitation is a distinct, practiced skill essential to managing group dynamics, pacing, and adapting exercises during workshops.
-
•
Scaling back workshops too much compromises their effectiveness and the quality of resulting concepts.
-
•
Explicit communication about workshop outcomes and quality is necessary to help stakeholders appreciate the method's value.
-
•
Training facilitators in focused, incremental sessions delivers practical skills necessary for leading effective workshops.
-
•
Ensuring equal participation requires setting clear engagement rules and providing tool training to accommodate varying skill levels.
Notable Quotes
"The outcome of this method really makes the difference between lightning and a lightning bug."
"Sprint as theater is not going to result in a product concept that really represents human needs, behaviors, and attitudes."
"If there is no structured way to move from data to concept, you often end up with just a brainstorm, not a grounded concept."
"Lack of research before or after the workshop can be recovered from but at some cost to the concept’s validity."
"Excluding key people might save time but it often leads to surprise blockers and misaligned decisions later on."
"Facilitation is a skill that takes real practice; it’s about managing personalities, stamina, and knowing when to adapt exercises."
"There is a point where scaling back a workshop too much will make it ineffective and that trade-off must be explicit."
"Many stakeholders don’t inherently understand the difference in quality outcomes from workshops, so we must be explicit."
"Getting to know what people care about in the organization helps tailor workshops to support those goals and gain buy-in."
"It’s important to create a sincere environment where everyone feels they can equally participate, regardless of title or skill level."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If you don’t feel connected and you’re standing alone, the challenge looks much bigger."
Marc Fonteijn Ru ButlerIncrease your confidence, influence, and impact (through a Professional Community)
December 3, 2024
"Asking stupid questions can lead experts to reframe their thinking and improve the work."
Dem Gerolemou Alexis Oh Neef RehmanClimate technology fundamentals
May 15, 2024
"We offer a quantitative approach so you can quickly recognize the strengths and weaknesses in a product compared to competitors."
Daniela Magaña Flores Ariane Rahn Jeff Ephraim BanderAhead of Competition: Learn What UX Benchmarking Can Do for Your Business Today
March 10, 2022
"Design systems are not just components but guidelines, rules, and principles to create consistent experiences."
Abbey Smalley Sylas SouzaScaling UX Past the Size of Your Team
January 8, 2024
"If you’re like us, you’d love to have 100% of the UX talent every project needs, but your team isn’t large enough."
Patrick CommarfordDesign Staffing for Impact
January 8, 2024
"Engaging communities requires thinking beyond western-centric tools, considering language and cultural relevance for accessibility."
Xenia Adjoubei Sean BruceEmpowering Communities Through the Researcher in Residence Program
March 29, 2023
"If you’re not paying for the product, you are the product."
Craig VillamorDesign Systems for Ethical Design
January 26, 2023
"DP&M tools pull together necessary reference materials and design deliverables, showing how they relate to each other."
Jon Fukuda Ellie KryslDesign Planning and Management Support
October 3, 2023
"Business language is for communication. We use it to explain why user centricity matters to broader audiences."
Iain McMaster IHan ChengDesign and Product: from Frenemy to Harmony
November 29, 2023
