Rosenverse

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Casual Inference

Friday, October 6, 2023 • QuantQual Interest Group
Share the love for this talk
Casual Inference
Speakers: Joshua Noble
Link:

Summary

You've probably heard the old adage "correlation does not imply causation" but at some point we've got to say that drinking boiling hot tea and burning our tongues are more than just "strongly correlated". Enter Causal Inference, a collection of techniques for reasoning about the relationship between effects that can be measured and causes that can be identified. It helps us bridge between what we hear when we talk directly to users and what we observe about their behavior at scale and over time. This talk will introduce some of the key techniques in causal inference and how they can be used by UX Researchers and Designers to understand potential users, current users, and the products we might build.

Key Insights

  • Causal inference bridges qualitative reasoning about context with quantitative analysis of data.

  • Directed acyclic graphs help visualize causal pathways and common pitfalls like confounders and colliders.

  • Randomized controlled experiments require random assignment, blinding, and pre-specified hypotheses to measure causal effects reliably.

  • Average treatment effect summarizes impact on an entire population, whereas intent-to-treat reveals experiment adherence issues.

  • Quasi-experimental methods like regression discontinuity and difference-in-differences allow causal inference when randomization is not possible.

  • Matching is an art, relying on context-aware ranges rather than exact numeric equivalence to equate comparison groups.

  • Synthetic control methods build counterfactual scenarios when no good control group exists.

  • Understanding and designing for interpretability strengthens collaboration between designers and analytics or marketing teams.

  • Qualitative research poses valuable questions; quantitative causal inference sharpens and tests these questions.

  • Behavioral causes revealed by causal inference may differ from user self-reported reasons, offering deeper insights.

Notable Quotes

"Correlation doesn’t imply causation, but sometimes two things happening together do imply a causal mechanism."

"Qualitative reasoning about causal mechanisms usually comes from lived experience, either the researcher or participants."

"Designers have a hard time interpreting econometrics-driven quantitative research without bridging approaches."

"Random assignment to treatment or control is essential—if it’s not random, it’s not a true experiment."

"If you cannot remove a treatment, it may not be a true cause."

"Matching is very much an art, not a science; there are no hard and fast rules for what counts as a good match."

"Difference-in-differences lets you study treatment effects in groups that start in very different places by looking at trends."

"Synthetic controls create counterfactuals using historical data when no suitable control group exists."

"Qualitative research really poses questions; quantitative methods let you investigate those questions rigorously."

"You don’t want to overdesign just to make something more data interpretable because that can lead you down a dark path."

Ask the Rosenbot
Llewyn Paine
Day 1 Using AI in UX with Impact
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Billy Carlson
Principles of Team Wireframing
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
JJ Kercher
A Roadmap for Maturing Design in the Enterprise
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Emily DiLeo
Stronger Together: Lessons Learned from UX Research Ops
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Lori Muszynski
Keeping Design Weird
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Elizabeth Sklar
Co-creating research enablement with your tech org: a case study
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Bria Alexander
Theme Two Intro
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Steve Portigal
Discussion
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Greg Nudelman
Designing Conversational Interfaces
2019 • Enterprise Community
Harry Max
Failure Friday #5: Lessons from a SaaS Design Failure
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Peter Van Dijck
Hands on AI #3: Claude Code for UX people
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Bryce Benton
[Demo] AI-powered UX enhancement: Aligning GitHub documentation with USWDS at Austin Public Library
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Patrizia Bertini
Pushing DesignOps’ Influence into New Global Markets
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Frances Yllana
DesignOps Exposed: What do our peers really think of us?
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Mark Interrante
Collaboration Flows in Product Development
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Lavrans Løvlie
Ask me anything – Authors of Service Design: From Insight to Implementation
2025 • Advancing Service Design 2025
Gold

More Videos

Greg Petroff

"There’s a new tech stack for software creation, all about cloud services and subscription-based business models."

Greg Petroff

Software as Material—A Redux

June 6, 2023

Brendan Jarvis

"If only we could just get that seat at the table."

Brendan Jarvis

Framing Tomorrow by Questioning Today

June 8, 2022

Prerna Makanawala

"Achieving coherency across products leads to less training, fewer support calls, and more users successfully adopting products."

Prerna Makanawala

Achieving Balanced Design Consistency

June 9, 2021

Tricia Wang

"Shapers combine human and machine intelligence and amplify each other’s strengths."

Tricia Wang

From Users to Shapers of AI: The Future of Research

March 25, 2024

Cheryl Platz

"The Echo Look failed because it missed key motivators like self-expression and companionship by focusing too much on AI."

Cheryl Platz

Embrace Your Fun Factor: Game Development Best Practices for Product Design

January 9, 2026

Ariel Kennan

"We’ll hear about creating healthy cultures and ways of working across many organizational silos, including vendors."

Ariel Kennan

Theme Two Intro

November 17, 2022

Tricia Wang

"You have to ask who the 'we' is in the room, because often the communities you're designing for aren't represented or understood there."

Tricia Wang

The most popular design thinking strategy is BS

January 27, 2022

Kristin Wisnewski

"Before, we never really looked holistically at decades of UX data—now we use it to be proactive and avoid duplicative studies."

Kristin Wisnewski

Measuring What Matters

October 23, 2019

Scott Jensen

"They’re not living out the Judgment of Solomon every day, where the baby can be split in half."

Scott Jensen Sarah Delaney Carmen Liu

Short Take #2: UX/Product Lessons from Your Industry Peers

December 6, 2022