Rosenverse
Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young

Thursday, December 12, 2019 • Advancing Research Community
Share the love for this talk
Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young
Speakers: Indi Young
Link:

Summary

In tech culture, everyone is hell-bent on coming up with answers and solutions. We all assume we know what the person’s problem is; rarely does tech culture start at the very beginning, understanding the variety of approaches real people have to their real purposes and different moods and contexts. Instead, we build an idea into experiments to see if it solves the imagined “problem.”

Sound familiar?

We can’t go on solving things based on our own thin understanding of how others perceive the problem. We can’t go on assuming everyone is in the same mood and context. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Indeed, we have done a lot of accidental harm in the world with the assumption that the tools we design are “neutral.” We need to get better at paying attention. We need to slow down and gather a richer, more nutritious understanding of the people we are trying to support. And we need to point a beam of light into possible future outcomes.

Let’s put equal emphasis on the problem. Spending equal time in the problem space generates rich understanding. Understanding the depths, perspectives, horizons and histories of the way people achieve their purposes opens up loads more opportunities. We can begin making solutions that eschew “engagement” to truly support different people in different ways.

The problem space deserves more attention and a slow cycle all of its own.

Key Insights

  • •

    Most organizations overemphasize solutions and ignore deep understanding of users’ purposes in the problem space.

  • •

    Big data correlations often lead to misleading conclusions if context and underlying reasoning aren’t explored.

  • •

    Demographic breakdowns like age or gender rarely capture the true diversity of user thinking and motivations.

  • •

    Thinking Styles are a more meaningful way to segment users based on their purposes and mental approaches.

  • •

    Listening sessions provide rich qualitative data necessary to build cognitive empathy and uncover deep user insights.

  • •

    Cognitive empathy is a skill that requires going beyond surface observations to understand people’s inner voices.

  • •

    Technology disciplines are immature compared to fields like architecture or museum design that prioritize varied user purposes.

  • •

    Most tech companies operate without proper ethical research oversight (e.g., institutional review boards).

  • •

    Jobs to Be Done is useful for strategy but inadequate alone without rich qualitative problem space research.

  • •

    Rich problem space research results remain valuable and relevant for years, unlike short-term solution testing data.

Notable Quotes

"We live in a solution culture that glorifies people who create solutions but not those who create knowledge."

"Correlation is not causation, and a lot of people in technology don’t understand that."

"Research theater is when results are designed just to create a reaction, not real understanding."

"Purpose is a super important word—understanding what a person is trying to get done, not just their behavior."

"You can’t meaningfully segment users by demographics alone if you want to support their real purposes."

"Cognitive empathy only forms with depth; you can’t build it at the surface level."

"Empathy is not sensitivity or an emotion—it is a skill that you have."

"Most technology research is not research at all but at best focus group testing, and often lacks ethics."

"We have this piece of glass and there’s a person on the other side, but we don’t understand their purpose."

"You have to build all the puzzle pieces with clear summaries before the patterns come together in mental models."

Ask the Rosenbot
Chris Geison
What is Research Strategy?
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Megan Kierstead
You Are a Badass at UX: Overcoming Imposter Syndrome
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Tina Weisser
When AI Agents Meet Reality. Service Design Lessons from a Pilot
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Louis Rosenfeld
Coffee with Lou #3: What Makes for a Successful UX Conference Presentation?
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
John Calhoun
Two Sides of the DesignOps Coin: Teams Ops and Product Ops
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
George Abraham
Design Systems To-Go: Indigo.Design Overview and Exploring the Developer Workflow (Part 3)
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Raven Veal
Dark Metrics: Illuminating the Negative Impact of Digital Health Design
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Iram Shah
Closing Keynote: The View from the Top
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Tricia Wang
SCALE: Discussion
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Patrick Boehler
Fishing for Real Needs: Reimagining Journalism Needs with AI
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Natalie Dunbar
DesignOps and Content Strategy: Envisioning the Future Together
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Dan Hill
Strategic design, slowdown, and the infrastructures of everyday life
2022 • Enterprise Community
Victor Udoewa
Radical Participatory Research: Decolonizing Participatory Processes
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Noel Lamb
Cultivating Business Partnerships to Grow Research Ops
2022 • Advancing Research Community
Greg Petroff
Exit Interview #1: Greg Petroff: From Silicon Valley Executive to Sonoma County Possibilitarian
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Sara Conklin
A UXer’s 12-Month Journey from Climate Concern to Climate Credibility
2025 • Climate UX Interest Group

More Videos

Marc Fonteijn

"Respondents who feel very connected are twice as likely to say they’re making a significant impact."

Marc Fonteijn Ru Butler

Increase your confidence, influence, and impact (through a Professional Community)

December 3, 2024

Dem Gerolemou

"Asking stupid questions can lead experts to reframe their thinking and improve the work."

Dem Gerolemou Alexis Oh Neef Rehman

Climate technology fundamentals

May 15, 2024

Daniela Magaña Flores

"We offer a quantitative approach so you can quickly recognize the strengths and weaknesses in a product compared to competitors."

Daniela Magaña Flores Ariane Rahn Jeff Ephraim Bander

Ahead of Competition: Learn What UX Benchmarking Can Do for Your Business Today

March 10, 2022

Abbey Smalley

"To influence others, you must be willing to be influenced and change your mind to align with organizational goals."

Abbey Smalley Sylas Souza

Scaling UX Past the Size of Your Team

January 8, 2024

Patrick Commarford

"When project scope changes, designers or design advisors raise their hand to reassess and adjust staffing accordingly."

Patrick Commarford

Design Staffing for Impact

January 8, 2024

Xenia Adjoubei

"We were interested in supporting networks of self-organization and mutual aid formed between refugees and host communities."

Xenia Adjoubei Sean Bruce

Empowering Communities Through the Researcher in Residence Program

March 29, 2023

Craig Villamor

"The only form of ethical persuasion that exists is when the goals of the persuader are aligned with the goals of the persuading."

Craig Villamor

Design Systems for Ethical Design

January 26, 2023

Jon Fukuda

"We don’t need a north star, we need a constellation that allows us to see the full picture."

Jon Fukuda Ellie Krysl

Design Planning and Management Support

October 3, 2023

Iain McMaster

"If you’re not embarrassed by what you share, you’ll share too late."

Iain McMaster IHan Cheng

Design and Product: from Frenemy to Harmony

November 29, 2023