Fishing for Real Needs: Reimagining Journalism Needs with AI
This video is featured in the Designing with AI 2025 playlist and 2 more.
Summary
Our team at Gazzetta, a media research lab, is tackling a fundamental challenge in journalism: the disconnect between media output and community needs, particularly in restricted or distorted information environments of autocracies. We have learnt over the past years that traditional audience research has led to quant-heavy, superficial understanding, ineffective content and, ultimately, irrelevance. To address this problem, we have developed a three-stage process using AI knowledge bases to build empathy, map information needs, and analyze information flows. We have used this process to systematically review multiple information sources to build deep community understanding before product development. This methodology has helped us preserve nuance, identify knowledge gaps, and assign confidence levels to findings. Rather than treating AI as a black box solution, a thoughtful process-oriented approach can help us better understand and serve information needs, and gradually rebuild relevance.
Key Insights
-
•
AI combined with structured research queries reveals deeper insights than traditional research when direct user access is limited.
-
•
Misalignment often exists between what organizations believe users need and what users actually need, as shown by North Korean fishermen preferring weather forecasts over political news.
-
•
Traditional engagement metrics only measure surface behavior, failing to capture true user information needs and satisfaction.
-
•
A shift from a theory of change (assuming known needs) to a theory of service (starting with understanding actual needs) is fundamental to effective media strategy and user-centered design.
-
•
A three-stage research approach—building empathy, prioritizing information gaps, and analyzing information flows—helps systematically leverage complex and scattered data.
-
•
Confidence rating of sources and insights is essential to prevent false certainty from AI-generated outputs.
-
•
Structured queries and systematic frameworks outperform opportunistic or freeform AI interactions, avoiding common pitfalls like overgeneralization and poor prompt design.
-
•
Human expertise, especially cultural knowledge, is indispensable to interpret AI outputs and maintain nuance.
-
•
Research repositories often hold untapped treasure troves of insights that, with structure and AI, can be mined even on shoestring budgets.
-
•
Visual coding of insights by confidence level improves transparency and decision-making among stakeholders.
Notable Quotes
"Journalists like me are in the business of interrogating reality to get at the truth."
"Those fishermen didn’t want political news—they wanted reliable weather forecasts to stay safe at sea."
"We spend millions on content that nobody wanted and that didn’t actually help people navigate their lives."
"Traditional metrics create a dangerous illusion where we optimize for what we can measure, not what people actually need."
"We’re moving from theory of change to theory of service: starting with what people actually need before creating anything."
"The careful application of structured queries can reveal deeper insights than traditional research alone."
"AI systems can present speculative connections as established facts, so confidence ratings are critical."
"Structure beats free form interaction—systematic query frameworks are essential to avoid pitfalls."
"Humans remain essential for evaluation, especially to interpret cultural nuance that AI often misses."
"Finding meaningful insights is not just casting a wide net—it requires discipline, structure, and knowing where to fish."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Assistive technology has to communicate with the destination, that’s your website or product."
Sheri Byrne-HaberAccessibility at Scale
June 9, 2021
"Empathy isn't just kindness, it's the lens through which we see users' true motivations."
Prayag Narula Hannah HudsonEmpowering Designers to do Good Research
March 11, 2022
"The UX team is never the keeper of all knowledge of the customer; the whole company owns the experience."
Janelle EstesUX Research Trends
January 28, 2021
"Collaboration without ego is key to building the right product, not just what one's own interests are."
Craig Brookes Andreas Huebner Morgan Quinn"Just Make it Look Good" and Other Ways We're Misunderstood
June 11, 2021
"Everyone goes through quite an extensive application process, but it was stress-free and informal."
Marc Fonteijn Ru ButlerIncrease your confidence, influence, and impact (through a Professional Community)
December 3, 2024
"The longer you take to recognize research ops and scale your team, the harder it becomes to amplify the value of your research investment — Carrie, Booking.com."
Kate TowseyThe State of ResearchOps: More Than Just Theory
June 20, 2019
"When we’re not safe, our thinking brain — the neocortex — shuts down and operating IQ drops by half."
Alla WeinbergDesign Teams Need Psychological Safety: Here’s How to Create It
September 9, 2022
"Slack channels and weekly meetings encourage cross-contract collaboration, avoiding duplication and sharing learnings across teams."
Shawna Hein Kevin HoffmanCreate a Cohesive Civic Design Practice Across Agency, Vendors, and Contracts
November 17, 2022
"You have to look two or three steps ahead so you're not chasing what's right in front of you — avoid target fixation."
Tricia WangSCALE: Discussion
June 15, 2018
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How can companies avoid or reduce survey fatigue among respondents?
What strategies motivate cross-functional teams to input their research findings into a centralized repository?
What are the core UX research tools essential for managing participant recruitment and study logistics in large companies?