Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Co-Design vs Faux-Design: Navigating the Complexities of Sharing Power in Co-Design
Summary
This interactive session takes a step beyond the introductory concepts of power to explore real-world tensions, trade-offs, and systemic barriers that make genuine power sharing a necessity in co-design. Though Power Sharing is not without challenge. Participants will unpack the difference between symbolic inclusion and true ownership, examining how institutional norms can unintentionally reinforce inequality even with 'lived experts' at the table. This session invites professionals, advocates, system designers, and lived experts alike to grapple with uncomfortable questions about who holds power and at what cost. It will equip participants with practical tools to recognize tokenism, navigate conflict, and build processes where lived experts drive true change.
Key Insights
-
•
Co-design is an approach that builds with, not for, communities by sharing power across the entire engagement.
-
•
Authentic lived experience must be directly relevant; proxies or near experiences risk diluting design intention.
-
•
Healing and trust-building are foundational to effective co-design, particularly given historical traumas in marginalized communities.
-
•
Power sharing requires explicit acknowledgment of power imbalances and establishing structures that allow community decision-making authority.
-
•
Participatory engagement should accommodate diverse communication and participation styles, including art, conversation, and digital formats.
-
•
Surveys tend to be less effective for trust-building and deep engagement compared to qualitative, relational methods like focus groups and one-on-ones.
-
•
Compensation for lived experts must be meaningful and equitable, recognizing their expertise as equally valuable as academic or professional input.
-
•
Removing participation barriers (e.g., childcare, internet access, food insecurity) is essential to equitable co-design processes.
-
•
A continuum of engagement—from ignoring to co-creating—helps organizations assess and evolve their community involvement strategies.
-
•
Innovations from lived experts are often practical and empathetic to systemic constraints, debunking myths about unrealistic demands.
Notable Quotes
"Together we can bridge the gap by incorporating lived expertise and knowledge through access and opportunity."
"If someone doesn’t have that direct lived experience, it’s not just enough to go to the closest thing you can find."
"We have a responsibility to help heal communities and build trust so we can do design with intention."
"Power is more than authority; it involves influence, privilege, and communication styles that shape dynamics."
"The same reason they hire us is the very reason why they fire us, because when things get real, it sometimes gets hard."
"You should never be engaging lived experts without compensating them for their time."
"When you’re doing a survey, think about if it can be done in a way that is much more accessible."
"Lived experts are the most innovative voice in the design process, bringing unique and practical solutions."
"Sometimes limitations mean you can’t fully co-create, but transparency about where you are on the engagement continuum matters."
"We want shared ownership and trust leading to community-led, informed, and sustainable outcomes."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Our work helps create space to zoom out and have conversations about the future vision."
Rebecca GimenezWork in Progress: Service Design at Airbnb
December 3, 2024
"The digital frontline workers in retail became critical almost overnight during the pandemic."
Lada GorlenkoTheme 2 Intro
June 9, 2022
"Having a repo isn’t the same as having a strategy for socializing and evangelizing the research."
Brigette Metzler Dana ChrisfieldResearch Repositories: A global project by the ResearchOps Community
August 27, 2020
"Ignore the people who hate you, embrace those who love you, and focus on the fence sitters."
Discussion
June 9, 2017
"I was largely wrong about how we thought technology and design would just implement policy."
Sarah Brooks Jennifer PahlkaFireside chat with Sarah Brooks and Jen Pahlka
October 21, 2021
"Every single thing that we would plan to say to the participant is spelled out in this interview guide to build transparency and trust."
Lisa Spitz Nikki BrandBuilding Trust Through Equitable Research Practices
November 18, 2022
"You don’t need an MD or PhD to be effective in healthcare UX; humility, curiosity, and preparation are essential."
Theresa NeilDesigning for Wellness: Specializing in Healthcare
May 22, 2024
"We have to show clients the hundreds of sketches and iterations behind the AI-generated outputs."
Maverick Chan Claire LinFrom Doodle to Demo: AI as Our Storytelling Partner
October 23, 2025
"When we’re mobilized or immobilized, our IQ literally drops by half and our peripheral vision narrows."
Alla WeinbergDesign Teams Need Psychological Safety: Here’s How to Create It
September 8, 2022