Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Research Democratization: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Gold
Thursday, March 10, 2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Share the love for this talk
Research Democratization: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Speakers: Kathleen Asjes
Link:

Summary

The pros and cons of democratizing user research are heavily debated. Often this is seen as a black and white scenario where we are solely in favour or against it. But what about all the shades of grey we can explore? Depending on the situation there are both benefits and dangers that lie in democratizing our research practice. Kathleen will share her experience with research democratization. Based on this she will show a framework that will help you assess when it is an appropriate tool to further research maturity and when it might derail you.

Key Insights

  • Research democratization empowers non-researchers to conduct research but requires careful management to avoid poor quality and misuse.

  • Lisa Reichelt warns that research can be misused to prematurely validate ideas, suggesting no research is better than bad research.

  • Jared Spool critiques the term democratization, highlighting risks of arrogance in delegating research to others solely for convenience.

  • Kathleen proposes a framework based on organizational research maturity and researcher presence to guide when democratization helps or hinders.

  • When research maturity and presence are both high, democratization is optional and can build empathy but is not necessary.

  • In medium maturity but high researcher presence contexts, democratization helps others learn research by doing, improving early-stage involvement.

  • Low researcher presence but high maturity organizations can use democratization to advocate for more research investment.

  • In low maturity and low researcher presence situations, democratization can overwhelm lone researchers with administrative burden rather than freeing them.

  • Research done by democratized teams may lack coordination, risking duplicated effort and isolated insights.

  • Teaching others research skills supports professional growth and confidence but must be balanced with researchers’ hands-on practice needs.

Notable Quotes

"Research democratization is all about empowering people who are not researchers to start doing research themselves."

"If you have to choose between doing bad research or no research at all, you’re better off not doing it — Lisa Reichelt."

"Democratization can be used arrogantly if we just let others do research so we can pick what’s fun for ourselves — Jared Spool."

"Research maturity refers to how research knowledge and impact permeate the organization, not individual skills."

"Involving non-researchers firsthand helps them understand research’s complexity and when to bring in experts."

"Research democratization rarely frees up strategic research time; it often increases facilitation and ops work."

"Sometimes democratized research happens in silence, with little coordination, causing duplicated efforts."

"Allowing others to experience research firsthand can convert them into advocates for hiring more researchers."

"Sharing your skills and teaching others can boost your confidence and professional development."

"Democratization requires different approaches; there’s no one-size-fits-all solution."

Ask the Rosenbot
Kristin Taylor
Building Bridges Across Organizational Silos
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Alex Hurworth
Designing a Contact Tracing App for Universal Access
2020 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Taylor Jennings
Repository Retrospective: Learnings from Introducing a Central Place for UX Research
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Sam Proulx
Accessibility: An Opportunity to Innovate
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Lori Muszynski
Keeping Design Weird
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Dan Saffer
Why AI projects fail (and what we can do about it)
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Nicole Umphress
Delivering Design Education During a Global Pandemic: Lessons Learned
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Ashley Cortez
Shifting Toward Community-Led Innovation in Local Government
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Christian Crumlish
Afternoon Insights Panel
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold
Peter Van Dijck
Hands-on AI #1: Let’s write your first AI eval
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Daniel Korczynski
From generic to contextual research insights with AI | Live Q&A
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Trisha Terhar
Empathizing with the Empowered: Non-Researcher Responses to Democratization
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Jacqui Frey
Flow and Superfluidity for Design Orgs
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Bassel Deeb
Do More With Less: Equip and Lead Design Orgs Through Adversity
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Mandy Drew
What Role(s) Can Research Play in Responsible Design?
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Katie Hansen
Experimental research: techniques for deep, psychology-driven insights
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold

More Videos

Greg Petroff

"AI assistance in user research doesn’t supplant humans; it augments and assists by helping us sift through large volumes of data."

Greg Petroff

Software as Material—A Redux

June 6, 2023

Brendan Jarvis

"I’m very fortunate. I have great medical care. I don’t know what’s going to happen, but I am going to live my life to the fullest."

Brendan Jarvis

Framing Tomorrow by Questioning Today

June 8, 2022

Prerna Makanawala

"When things behave the same way, users don’t have to worry about what will happen—that’s the intuitive factor."

Prerna Makanawala

Achieving Balanced Design Consistency

June 9, 2021

Tricia Wang

"Shapers combine human and machine intelligence and amplify each other’s strengths."

Tricia Wang

From Users to Shapers of AI: The Future of Research

March 25, 2024

Cheryl Platz

"The Echo Look failed because it missed key motivators like self-expression and companionship by focusing too much on AI."

Cheryl Platz

Embrace Your Fun Factor: Game Development Best Practices for Product Design

January 9, 2026

Ariel Kennan

"There’s inherent conflict that will arise when navigating many stakeholders."

Ariel Kennan

Theme Two Intro

November 17, 2022

Tricia Wang

"Make a note when something about your design process doesn't feel right—discomfort is a guide to curiosity and improvement."

Tricia Wang

The most popular design thinking strategy is BS

January 27, 2022

Kristin Wisnewski

"Before, we never really looked holistically at decades of UX data—now we use it to be proactive and avoid duplicative studies."

Kristin Wisnewski

Measuring What Matters

October 23, 2019

Scott Jensen

"I wish I knew it was okay to invest in relationships; that’s how incremental change happens."

Scott Jensen Sarah Delaney Carmen Liu

Short Take #2: UX/Product Lessons from Your Industry Peers

December 6, 2022