Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Have fun with statistics?
Summary
Let’s face it, many of us feel daunted by statistics. But we also know that colleagues and clients ask whether our research has “statistically significant” results. Erin’s book Design for Impact helps you to test your hypotheses about improving design, and she guides you through deciding on your effect sizes to help you get those statistically significant results. Caroline’s book Surveys That Work talks about “significance in practice” and she’s not all that convinced about whether it’s worth aiming for statistical significance. Watch this lively session where Erin and Caroline compared and contrasted their ideas and approaches - helped by your questions and contributions.
Key Insights
-
•
Statistical significance often confuses practitioners because it requires mentally flipping hypotheses and disproving nulls, which is cognitively demanding.
-
•
Effect size is critical to understanding whether a change detected by statistics is meaningful in practice, a concept often neglected in statistics education.
-
•
Fast progress isn't necessarily good progress; teams benefit from slowing down and using statistics to ensure they're moving in the right direction.
-
•
Engineers can be reluctant to implement experiments due to the extra coding load, but they respond well when they understand the learning value gained.
-
•
Survey results (the numerical outcomes) are often confused with the number of respondents required for statistical significance, leading to misunderstandings.
-
•
Statistical thresholds like 95% confidence can be adjusted depending on project needs; lower confidence levels are sometimes acceptable.
-
•
A good hypothesis often starts as an intuitive guess, which gets refined over time through repeated testing and data collection.
-
•
Qualitative and quantitative research should be viewed as complementary tools in a holistic research approach rather than opposed methods.
-
•
AI tools can help generate first drafts of survey questions, but human-centered pilot testing is essential to avoid errors and misinterpretations.
-
•
It's common and acceptable to act on results that are significant in practice but not statistically significant, especially when outcomes clearly affect users.
Notable Quotes
"Statistics is hard because you have to flip flop in your head: think of a hypothesis, then a null hypothesis, then try to disprove the null."
"People confuse statistical significance with significance in practice — they want to know if the change is meaningful, not just mathematically significant."
"Fast is not a virtue in and of itself; moving slower and acting with intention ensures you go in the right direction."
"Engineers hate writing more code, so getting them to buy into experiments means showing the value of the learning on the other side."
"You can have an effect size that matters in practice but isn’t statistically significant, like five users failing a key task in usability testing."
"Most science starts with somebody pulling a number out of their ass — it’s okay to start with a gut instinct or guess."
"Statistics is another tool in our toolbox, part of a hierarchy of evidence that includes qualitative and quantitative methods."
"AI can create first drafts of survey questions, but unless you pilot test with real humans, you won’t know if your audience gets it."
"A lot of people think 95% confidence is the only way, but you can adjust confidence levels based on your situation and needs."
"Start with basics like means, minimums, and ranges — statistics rapidly becomes less mysterious and more useful with practice."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"What if learning was always mobile, decentralized, distributed among people and institutions, with new ways to acknowledge learning beyond grades?"
Nathan Shedroff Hugh Dubberly Thomas J. McLeishHow Will Design be Taught When the Schools Shut Down?
May 8, 2026
"Spending more time doesn’t automatically make you productive, it just means you spent more time doing things."
John Paul de Guzman10k Screens Later: How We Became a Data-Driven Design Organization
September 24, 2024
"Advanced logic, matrix questioning, AI survey design creation — these are baseline capabilities you should expect from any modern survey tool."
Aleksandra Korczynska Caroline Jarrett Justyna ParmeeSurvey Tools
March 12, 2026
"What are some of the metrics that you’ll use to measure the health of your teams and practice?"
Kristin SkinnerTheme 2: Introduction and Provocation
January 8, 2024
"Workshop content is equivalent to a one-day in-person event spread over 10 virtual hours with coaching and support."
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW Victor Udoewa Jennifer StricklandEverything You Need to Know about the Civic Design 2022 Call for Presentations
May 17, 2022
"Are we feeling trapped in this thing called UX design, limited by mechanized processes like agile?"
Uday GajendarThe Rise of Meta-Design: A Starter Playbook
May 19, 2022
"Giving feedback is a skill, just like design. It takes practice and care."
Vanessa VarinFeedback: The Other F-Word
September 10, 2025
"Small companies like Descartes Labs built supercomputers entirely in AWS with no physical servers, showing a profound shift in how computing power is accessed."
Hugh DubberlyProblems with Problems: Reconsidering the Frame of Designing as Problem-Solving
June 19, 2019
"Research wasn’t meant to be a silo. It was meant to be a guiding function, a system for creating shared knowledge that drives better decisions."
Sean McKayCoexisting with non-researchers: Practical strategies for a democratized research future
March 11, 2025
