Rosenverse
Have fun with statistics?

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Have fun with statistics?

Thursday, December 12, 2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Share the love for this talk
Have fun with statistics?
Speakers: Caroline Jarrett and Erin Weigel
Link:

Summary

Let’s face it, many of us feel daunted by statistics. But we also know that colleagues and clients ask whether our research has “statistically significant” results. Erin’s book Design for Impact helps you to test your hypotheses about improving design, and she guides you through deciding on your effect sizes to help you get those statistically significant results. Caroline’s book Surveys That Work talks about “significance in practice” and she’s not all that convinced about whether it’s worth aiming for statistical significance. Watch this lively session where Erin and Caroline compared and contrasted their ideas and approaches - helped by your questions and contributions.

Key Insights

  • •

    Statistical significance often confuses practitioners because it requires mentally flipping hypotheses and disproving nulls, which is cognitively demanding.

  • •

    Effect size is critical to understanding whether a change detected by statistics is meaningful in practice, a concept often neglected in statistics education.

  • •

    Fast progress isn't necessarily good progress; teams benefit from slowing down and using statistics to ensure they're moving in the right direction.

  • •

    Engineers can be reluctant to implement experiments due to the extra coding load, but they respond well when they understand the learning value gained.

  • •

    Survey results (the numerical outcomes) are often confused with the number of respondents required for statistical significance, leading to misunderstandings.

  • •

    Statistical thresholds like 95% confidence can be adjusted depending on project needs; lower confidence levels are sometimes acceptable.

  • •

    A good hypothesis often starts as an intuitive guess, which gets refined over time through repeated testing and data collection.

  • •

    Qualitative and quantitative research should be viewed as complementary tools in a holistic research approach rather than opposed methods.

  • •

    AI tools can help generate first drafts of survey questions, but human-centered pilot testing is essential to avoid errors and misinterpretations.

  • •

    It's common and acceptable to act on results that are significant in practice but not statistically significant, especially when outcomes clearly affect users.

Notable Quotes

"Statistics is hard because you have to flip flop in your head: think of a hypothesis, then a null hypothesis, then try to disprove the null."

"People confuse statistical significance with significance in practice — they want to know if the change is meaningful, not just mathematically significant."

"Fast is not a virtue in and of itself; moving slower and acting with intention ensures you go in the right direction."

"Engineers hate writing more code, so getting them to buy into experiments means showing the value of the learning on the other side."

"You can have an effect size that matters in practice but isn’t statistically significant, like five users failing a key task in usability testing."

"Most science starts with somebody pulling a number out of their ass — it’s okay to start with a gut instinct or guess."

"Statistics is another tool in our toolbox, part of a hierarchy of evidence that includes qualitative and quantitative methods."

"AI can create first drafts of survey questions, but unless you pilot test with real humans, you won’t know if your audience gets it."

"A lot of people think 95% confidence is the only way, but you can adjust confidence levels based on your situation and needs."

"Start with basics like means, minimums, and ranges — statistics rapidly becomes less mysterious and more useful with practice."

Ask the Rosenbot
Matt Stone
Scaling Empathy, A Case Study in Change Management
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
David Cronin
The GE Design System and Thoughts about Craft at Scale
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Sol Mesz
Hands or Brains? How to Hire for Strategy, Strategically
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Sha Hwang
The Lost Year
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Tom Armitage
Day 2 Panel: Looking ahead: Designing with AI in 2026
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Sam Proulx
SUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Jenny Price
From Tradition to Transformation: Unlocking Startup Agility in a Legacy Enterprise
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Lada Gorlenko
Theme 1: Intro
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Angelos Arnis
State of DesignOps: Learnings from the 2021 Global Report
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Uday Gajendar
From AI to Zeitgeist: Theory as the design antidote to AI hype
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Luca Rager
Empowering Gaming at Scale: How Xbox Builds Powerful, Automated, and Distributed Design Systems with Sketch
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Nova Wehman-Brown
We've Never Done This Before
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Justin Entzminger
Risk and Reward: How to Diversify the Field of Civic Innovators and Designers
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Lada Gorlenko
Theme 1: Discussion
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Edgar Anzaldua Moreno
Using Research to Determine Unique Value Proposition
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Yasmine Khan
Checking Bias and Listening to Financially Vulnerable Americans
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold

More Videos

Corey Long

"Don’t read canned questions during interviews; make it conversational and human."

Corey Long

Hiring in DesignOps: A Critical Study on How to Hire and Get Hired

September 23, 2024

Gretchen Anderson

"That’s the kind of feature that never would have made it to the top of anyone’s backlog without design."

Gretchen Anderson

Scaling the Human Center

June 8, 2017

Lori Muszynski

"Down the road, giving designers room to cross-train across disciplines creates happier, more versatile teams."

Lori Muszynski Peter Merholz

Keeping Design Weird

October 2, 2023

Sam Proulx

"Screen readers let us jump directly to content, replicating visual skimming of a web page."

Sam Proulx

SUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population

June 9, 2021

Prayag Narula

"Users are smart, innovative, and a lot of the innovation actually comes from users rather than big companies."

Prayag Narula Rida Qadri

HCI 2.0: Humanity Deserves the Attention that UX Research has to Offer

March 28, 2023

Deanna Smith

"Assessing feedback urgency means understanding if the issue blocks critical work or if there are workarounds."

Deanna Smith

Leading Change with Confidence: Strategies for Optimizing Your Process

September 23, 2024

Lija Hogan

"Process matters — people should not just do research for the sake of research."

Lija Hogan

Doing more with more: Lessons from the Front Lines of Democratization

March 9, 2022

Sam Proulx

"We are beginning to see cycles of history repeat themselves in accessibility, especially in gaming and AR/VR."

Sam Proulx

To Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility

March 11, 2022

Bria Alexander

"You don’t have to take notes; session videos and decks will be shared as soon as possible."

Bria Alexander

Opening Remarks

October 3, 2023