The new horizon of ethnography: using AI to unlock the full potential of in-person research
Summary
I contend that AI’s real opportunity lies in depth, not just speed. We’re getting distracted by speed, and failing to see the potential of depth.
In this talk, I argue that AI gives us the rare opportunity to restore depth to qualitative research. Instead of treating automation as a shortcut, we used AI tools to absorb labour-intensive tasks (cleaning transcripts, tagging footage, structuring notes etc) so we could reinvest that time in what remains the most data-dense method in our practice: immersive, in-person ethnography.
I’ll draw on three recent consulting projects I directed:
1. In-home health research in Atlanta
2. Retail ethnography across London, Hamburg, and Milan
3. A follow-on multi-city retail study in London, Paris, Berlin, and Milan
By redirecting AI-generated time savings into deeper fieldwork, we expanded ethnographic activities: from extended “deep hanging out” (to borrow Clifford Geertz’s phrase) to ethnographic journaling and collaborative interpretation moments in-field.
I’ll also share how we brought non-research stakeholders into the field, and why AI was essential in making that investment possible — transforming not just insights, but internal conviction and cross-functional alignment.
My goal for the audience is to come away from the talk inspired and motivated. I want people to use AI tools to help mitigate all the usual tradeoffs we as researchers have had to make over the years when conducting in-person research.
Key Insights
-
•
AI tools can significantly accelerate pre-fieldwork preparation by quickly synthesizing existing research to onboard new team members faster.
-
•
Reallocating time saved by AI from administrative tasks into more immersive, participatory in-field research enhances empathy and context.
-
•
Including more senior researchers in the field becomes possible by offloading transcript and data processing to AI, increasing research track capacity.
-
•
Dialectical analysis with AI (hypothesis testing and disproving) speeds up sense-making and yields stronger storylines.
-
•
Immersion activities informed by AI-optimized planning can deepen researcher insight by using body and emotional awareness as data.
-
•
Bringing clients into daily AI-assisted analysis sessions in the field fosters better participation, alignment, and earlier ideation.
-
•
Transparency about AI usage with clients is crucial, especially in tech sectors where AI adoption is both expected and monitored.
-
•
Rapid AI experimentation through sprints and collaboration with data science teams helps tailor AI use efficiently to research workflows.
-
•
Current AI limitations remain in highly tailored deliverables like proposals, requiring human refinement despite AI-assisted drafting.
-
•
Clients become advocates of research when engaged firsthand, which supports sustaining deep research in cost-conscious environments.
Notable Quotes
"The core thesis is that saving time with AI and reallocating it into research itself unlocks the true potential of the field."
"It often feels like research becomes beholden to exact quotes rather than the richer story that context provides, what I call the tyranny of transcripts."
"We used AI tools like NotebookLM and Gemini primarily to shortcut getting up to speed and managing transcripts, without focusing on specific tools themselves."
"Adding a senior researcher, Izzy, in field meant we could have more, smaller research tracks and better support for research newbies."
"Our AI-supported mornings were no longer about just dotting the I’s and crossing the T’s, but deeper analysis sessions including clients."
"In this context, sometimes slower is actually faster because it allows going deeper and unlocking more meaningful insights."
"For many of our tech clients, there’s a demand not just to use AI but to transparently show how and why, to respond to internal scrutiny."
"We experimented with AI-powered sprints, but had lots of dead ends and false starts before finding what really works for us."
"AI can’t yet fully replace bespoke and careful proposal building, though it helps junior researchers draft the first outlines."
"When clients join us in the field and experience research deeply, they often become advocates who come back for more."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"There are roles out there, but they come with longer processes—some of mine lasted up to five months."
Corey LongHiring in DesignOps: A Critical Study on How to Hire and Get Hired
September 23, 2024
"Human-centered design is not just about your end users, it’s about the humans in your team."
Gretchen AndersonScaling the Human Center
June 8, 2017
"I see this opportunity to imbue these rigid, bureaucratic corporate contexts with humanism to put people at the center of the work."
Lori Muszynski Peter MerholzKeeping Design Weird
October 2, 2023
"Accessibility is a spectrum; if frequent tasks require assistance, the product is inaccessible for me."
Sam ProulxSUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
June 9, 2021
"Companies have started building their own base camps, but these feel more exclusionary compared to grassroots ones."
Prayag Narula Rida QadriHCI 2.0: Humanity Deserves the Attention that UX Research has to Offer
March 28, 2023
"Assessing feedback urgency means understanding if the issue blocks critical work or if there are workarounds."
Deanna SmithLeading Change with Confidence: Strategies for Optimizing Your Process
September 23, 2024
"You need a thoughtful operation managing your democratization program to keep it on track and adaptable."
Lija HoganDoing more with more: Lessons from the Front Lines of Democratization
March 9, 2022
"Accessibility is no longer considered something that someone else should do — it’s a first-party responsibility."
Sam ProulxTo Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility
March 11, 2022
"The code of conduct is on every page of our site; it includes procedures for getting assistance."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
October 3, 2023
