Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

SUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population

Gold
Wednesday, September 29, 2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Share the love for this talk
SUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
Speakers: Sam Proulx
Link:

Summary

Did you know that the SUS creates biases in your research, affecting one in five people? That’s right! People with disabilities, especially those who use assistive technology, are not considered by most of the questions in the SUS. As a designer, this could lead to you making design decisions that don’t take into account 20 percent of the visitors to your website. When the SUS was invented, the author encouraged people to change it to suit different needs. In this talk, Samuel Proulx from Fable will discuss how Fable adapted the SUS to work for assistive technology users. Drawing from over five thousand hours of research and testing involving assistive technology users, we created the Accessible Usability Scale (AUS). This presentation will include trends in AUS responses since it was released in December of 2020.

Key Insights

  • Screen readers require highly structured and semantically correct web content to enable efficient navigation for blind users.

  • Screen reader users often customize speed and voice settings to consume information at 400-800 words per minute, much faster than typical speech.

  • Alternative navigation devices, such as head mice and switch systems, rely on precise physical control and can be hindered by environmental factors like vibrations.

  • Current think-aloud usability testing methods create cognitive overload for assistive technology users, as they must manage device output, researcher communication, and narration simultaneously.

  • Travel and physical accessibility barriers severely limit the participation of people with disabilities in traditional usability labs.

  • Assistive technologies are highly personalized, so standard lab setups often fail to support users’ customized configurations, reducing test validity.

  • Standard System Usability Scale (SUS) questions inadequately capture the unique needs and experiences of assistive technology users.

  • Fable’s Accessible Usability Scale (AUS) adapts SUS questions to reflect assistive technology usage, improving relevance and accuracy.

  • Preliminary AUS results show screen reader users rate usability lower than magnification users, reflecting the greater complexity and demands of screen reader use.

  • Inclusive research requires adapting methods to account for varied assistive technologies, emphasizing flexibility and one-size-does-not-fit-all approaches.

Notable Quotes

"What screen readers allow us to do is to jump directly to bits of content that we are interested in to replicate the visual experience of skimming a web page."

"Most screen reader users prefer robotic voices so they can speed up the speech and read much faster than typical people."

"Alternative navigation includes things like switch systems, voice dictation, and head mice to replace standard keyboard and mouse."

"Traveling to a research lab can take longer than the research session itself for people with physical disabilities due to specialty transit."

"Every piece of assistive technology is highly customized for the individual, so labs often fail to replicate users’ ideal setups."

"The standard SUS question about needing a technical person to use the system is frustrating because many assistive tech users are very technical themselves."

"The question who are most people is confusing when applied to assistive technology users in usability scales."

"John Rucklin said if your questionnaire isn’t relevant, you can devise your own — and that’s what we did with the Accessible Usability Scale."

"Screen reader users scored in the low to mid 50s on our scale while magnification users scored around 70 and alternative navigation users around 60."

"Inclusive design is about one size fits one, not one size fits all, especially in research methodologies."

Ask the Rosenbot
Melissa Tsang
From Insights to Action: Driving Business Values through DesignOps
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Saara Kamppari-Miller
Cartography for Design Communities
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Daniel Gloyd
Designing From the Inside Out: How Method Acting Can Inspire Design Research
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Barb Spanton
Doing Work That Matters: A Look Beyond The Idealistic Notion of 'Doing Meaningful Work'
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Laura Schaefer
DesignOps: A Conduit for Inclusion
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Charlotte Lee
Theme 1 Intro
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Ana Maria Montero Barrantes
The Authentic UX Talent Show
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Dianne Que
Real Talk: Proving Value through a Scrappy Playbook
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
JP Allen
Navigating the UX Tools Landscape
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Alla Weinberg
People Are Sick of Change: Psychological Safety is the Cure
2023 • DesignOps Community
Kavana Ramesh
Meaningful inclusion: Practicing accessibility research with confidence
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Tom Armitage
Day 2 Panel: Looking ahead: Designing with AI in 2026
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Erin Weigel
Testing and Experimentation Tools
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Nathan Shedroff
How Will Design be Taught When the Schools Shut Down?
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Laura Klein
Human vs. machine: Testing AI’s ability to synthesize and analyze research
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Shan Shen
Translating UX Terms into Business Contexts
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold

More Videos

Sheri Byrne-Haber

"You’re not supposed to sell to the US public sector unless you’re WCAG 2.0 AA compliant."

Sheri Byrne-Haber

Accessibility at Scale

June 9, 2021

Prayag Narula

"Observation reveals needs users themselves haven’t recognized yet."

Prayag Narula Hannah Hudson

Empowering Designers to do Good Research

March 11, 2022

Janelle Estes

"Centralized teams can become 'no machines' when overwhelmed with requests, needing to prioritize carefully."

Janelle Estes

UX Research Trends

January 28, 2021

Craig Brookes

"Collaboration without ego is key to building the right product, not just what one's own interests are."

Craig Brookes Andreas Huebner Morgan Quinn

"Just Make it Look Good" and Other Ways We're Misunderstood

June 11, 2021

Marc Fonteijn

"Respondents who feel very connected are twice as likely to say they’re making a significant impact."

Marc Fonteijn Ru Butler

Increase your confidence, influence, and impact (through a Professional Community)

December 3, 2024

Kate Towsey

"Designing the service so the team can be efficient and impactful is essential — otherwise you just move the inefficiency around."

Kate Towsey

The State of ResearchOps: More Than Just Theory

June 20, 2019

Alla Weinberg

"Sometimes the entire leadership team quitting at once is a big sign cultural safety is failing."

Alla Weinberg

Design Teams Need Psychological Safety: Here’s How to Create It

September 9, 2022

Shawna Hein

"A government designer aims to reduce UX variation while a contractor may optimize only their single product, creating potential conflicts."

Shawna Hein Kevin Hoffman

Create a Cohesive Civic Design Practice Across Agency, Vendors, and Contracts

November 17, 2022

Tricia Wang

"Every culture has things to celebrate and improve upon; we should learn from others instead of imposing our own standards."

Tricia Wang

SCALE: Discussion

June 15, 2018