Accessible only to conference ticket holders.
Log in Create account Buy conference recordings
For 90 days after a conference, only paid ticket holders can watch conference videos. After that, all Gold members have access.
If you have purchased recording access and cannot see the video, please contact support.
Tiny team, moonshot impact: Democratizing research across continents
Summary
How does a team of 2.5 researchers support an organisation of 500-1,000 people? And what happens if we give away the last bits of power we have by exposing our craft? Welcome to ResearchOps 2.0. We’ve stopped debating democratisation (that’s so 2022) and started enabling it: tooling, coaching, and confidence at scale. We moved democratisation from theory to practice and extended our reach. Continuous enablement for teams close to us, plus Innovation Hubs twice-a-year events where teams from across disciplines and continents run their first real studies. These hubs connect us with people we’d never normally meet and unlock research at a scale that once felt impossible. With support from our Digital Experience team and VP, we equipped colleagues from ~10 diverse teams to do research—ethically and effectively. The outcome? In one quarter: - 500 interviews - 250 unmoderated tests - 1,700 survey responses Many led by first-time moderators from product, design, and business. This isn’t about replacing researchers. It’s about building a research culture so strong that everyone wants in and says, “Research is cool.”
Key Insights
-
•
A tiny research team can multiply their impact by enabling non-researchers to conduct customer research with proper coaching and guardrails.
-
•
Embedding generative research within existing large B2B conferences leverages customer volume and interest difficult to achieve through traditional recruitment.
-
•
In-person research builds stronger customer empathy and rapport than artifacts or remote methods alone.
-
•
Co-creation with customers leads to more actionable insights and greater engagement, especially in technical, regulated industries like aerospace.
-
•
Shifting research from execution to strategic advising requires moving from fulfilling requests to framing problems and guiding direction.
-
•
Quality is protected through coaching not caretaking, commitment enforcement, thorough rehearsals, and centralizing legal and consent responsibilities.
-
•
The Innovation Hub built a coalition of 30 research advocates across diverse disciplines within a year, increasing customer fluency organization-wide.
-
•
Despite progress, the appetite for tactical research remains stronger than for strategic, long-term projects, highlighting ongoing cultural challenges.
-
•
Providing opportunities for peer exchange among research participants increases ongoing engagement and capability retention.
-
•
Democratization must be actively designed and owned by research teams, embracing a system designer mindset rather than a victim mindset.
Notable Quotes
"The debate about democratization is over. The question now is how do we make the most out of it."
"We could either become an internal service desk that's always at capacity or find a lever that multiplies our impact."
"Customer voice lives in minds, not in artifacts. We want people to truly hear how customers think and what they value."
"Co-creation is highly actionable for teams and genuinely engaging for customers."
"We do research not just to generate insights but to embed empathy across the organization."
"Scale without guardrails becomes chaos. Coaching not caretaking protects learning and accountability."
"The role of research is shifting from making to advising, from executing studies to shaping problem framing."
"Teams openly said they didn’t know how to ask questions before and discovered research is cool afterwards."
"We built a coalition of about 30 research advocates in a single year. That’s powerful."
"Democratization was never something that happened to research. It was something I chose to design to make work for my team."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Without a human in the loop, AI can go off and do crazy disastrous things."
Jon Fukuda Amy Evans Ignacio Martinez Joe MeersmanThe Big Question about Innovation: A Panel Discussion
September 25, 2024
"Diverse teams build diverse products."
Sam ProulxAccessibility: An Opportunity to Innovate
March 9, 2022
"Bad data in, bad data out — making sure research participants are diverse by race, gender, tenure, and location is crucial for inclusive products."
Anna Avrekh Amy Jiménez Márquez Morgan C. Ramsey Catarina TsangDiversity In and For Design: Building Conscious Diversity in Design and Research
June 9, 2021
"Context retention is tough; Siri and Google Assistant completely lose prior contexts after one action."
Greg NudelmanDesigning Conversational Interfaces
November 14, 2019
"Our approach eliminates the need for developers to inspect design specs to recreate styling and layouts from scratch."
George Abraham Stefan IvanovDesign Systems To-Go: Reimagining Developer Handoff, and Introducing App Builder (Part 2)
October 1, 2021
"People don’t talk about their real fears in stakeholder meetings, and that hurts research credibility."
Shipra KayanMake your research synthesis speedy and more collaborative using a canvas
January 24, 2025
"The experience of using a screen reader is probably 10 times faster as you become more expert with it."
Sam ProulxDesigning For Screen Readers: Understanding the Mental Models and Techniques of Real Users
December 10, 2021
"We moved from Evernote to spreadsheets, to a giant affinity board in Mirror, then to UserVoice, and finally to idiomatic software with AI."
Shipra KayanHow we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up
September 30, 2021
"For some users, AI products are not just tools, they are relationships."
Dane DeSutterKeeping the Body in Mind: What Gestures and Embodied Actions Tell You That Users May Not
March 26, 2024
