Rosenverse
AI in Real Life: Using LLMs to Turbocharge Microsoft Learn

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

AI in Real Life: Using LLMs to Turbocharge Microsoft Learn

Thursday, February 13, 2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Share the love for this talk
AI in Real Life: Using LLMs to Turbocharge Microsoft Learn
Speakers: Sarah Barrett
Link:

Summary

Enthusiasm for AI tools, especially large language models like ChatGPT, is everywhere, but what does it actually look like to deliver large-scale user-facing experiences using these tools in a production environment? Clearly they're powerful, but what do they need to make them work reliably and at scale? In this session, Sarah provides a perspective on some of the information architecture and user experience infrastructure organizations need to effectively leverage AI. She also shares three AI experiences currently live on Microsoft Learn:
  • An interactive assistant that helps users post high-quality questions to a community forum
  • A tool that dynamically creates learning plans based on goals the user shares
  • A training assistant that clarifies, defines, and guides learners while they study
Through lessons learned from shipping these experiences over the last two years, UXers, IAs, and PMs will come away with a better sense of what they might need to make these hyped-up technologies work in real life.

Key Insights

  • •

    Most AI applications no longer require building foundation models from scratch; the focus is now on application development and integration.

  • •

    Single, all-purpose chatbots (everything chatbots) are insufficient because they handle high ambiguity and diverse, often complex tasks poorly.

  • •

    Sarah introduces the ambiguity footprint as a framework to measure AI application complexity and risks across several axes such as task complexity, context, interface, prompt openness, and sensitivity.

  • •

    AI features that support simple, complimentary user tasks, rather than critical or complex ones, are easier and safer to build and scale.

  • •

    Visible AI interfaces, like chatbots, set clearer user expectations but introduce more ambiguity and management overhead compared to invisible AI (e.g., keyboard optimizations).

  • •

    Prompt engineering plays a crucial role in defining the boundaries of AI output, from very open-ended to highly restricted scopes.

  • •

    Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) helps manage up-to-date context by dynamically querying relevant data chunks rather than using static corpus.

  • •

    Evaluating AI outputs rigorously is essential but often underprioritized; without clear quality metrics, teams end up relying on subjective or anecdotal assessments.

  • •

    Data ethics and distributed AI implementations can create blind spots, limiting feedback loops necessary for continuous AI model improvement.

  • •

    Incrementally building AI applications with smaller ambiguity footprints helps organizations develop expertise and controls before tackling more complex, open-ended AI products.

Notable Quotes

"You’re not doing IA, but you’re always doing it."

"An everything chat bot is almost certainly not how you’re going to build it; realistically you’re building three apps in a trench coat."

"AI is ambiguous at best because we’re fully in the realm of probabilistic rather than deterministic programming."

"The more complex the task, the less likely it is to be successful with current AI."

"A task where AI adds a little something is honestly easier to get right than one where it’s absolutely critical."

"Visible AI interfaces introduce another place where you can add ambiguity."

"Retrieval Augmented Generation lets you supply specific relevant information to the model dynamically rather than everything at once."

"Evaluation might be the most important part of your entire development effort and is often the hardest to do well."

"You can’t just eyeball results and call it good; AI applications are expensive and complex and require systematic evaluation."

"Never build or buy an everything chat bot again; start with less ambiguous, targeted AI experiences."

Ask the Rosenbot
Kwabena Opoku
Methodological toolkit for unique research impact
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Harry Max
Failure Friday #5: Lessons from a SaaS Design Failure
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Erika Flowers
Introduction to MURAL for UX
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Erin Weigel
UX Lessons from running more than 1,200 A/B Tests
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Erin Malone
Understanding the past to prepare for the future
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Saara Kamppari-Miller
Theme Three Intro
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Sofia Quintero
Beyond Tools: The Messy Business of Implementing Research Repositories
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Samuel Proulx
Designing beyond caricatures: Embracing real, diverse user needs
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW
Leading through the long tail of trauma
2022 • Enterprise Community
Charles Lee
Building a New Home for the Atlassian Design System
2020 • Enterprise Community
Lija Hogan
Three Years Out: Perspectives on the Near-Term Future of User Research
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Kevin M. Hoffman
Theme 2: Enterprise Team Journey
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Alberto Ferreira
Making it Count: Developing a custom digital metric framework that works
2021 • QuantQual Interest Group
Kristin Skinner
Theme 1 Intro
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Sean Fitzell
Craft of User Research: Building Out Jobs to be Done Maps
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Kate Koch
Flex Your Super Powers: When a Design Ops Team Scales to Power CX
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold

More Videos

Mark Interrante

"Prioritization work is a political process, and politics are hard to do in technology."

Mark Interrante Harry Max

AI for Prioritization (3rd of 3 seminars)

July 11, 2024

Patrizia Bertini

"Next year we need to have an accessibility budget. You do what you want, but that's the choice."

Patrizia Bertini

The (r)evolution of designOps: It’s Time to Think (really) BIG

September 11, 2025

Shan Shen

"The phrase card sort may not require translation itself, but the activity it represents certainly does."

Shan Shen

Translating UX Terms into Business Contexts

November 29, 2023

Adam Thomas

"You have to ask, what are we deciding, and what are we quitting, on a regular basis."

Adam Thomas

Survival Metrics – Making Change in a Fast, Data-Informed, and Politically Safe Way

December 6, 2022

Robin Beers

"There is no quick fix to culture — the sales versus service divide at Wells Fargo was a cultural issue that required bravery to address."

Robin Beers

Research as a Catalyst for Organizational Transformation

March 12, 2021

Sheri Byrne-Haber

"Assistive technology has to communicate with the destination, that’s your website or product."

Sheri Byrne-Haber

Accessibility at Scale

June 9, 2021

Joseph Meersman

"Designers are uniquely entitled to critique—it’s a privilege to rigorously improve craft while others might envy that process."

Joseph Meersman

Sweating the Pixel: Scaling Quality through Critique

June 10, 2021

Deanna Washington

"Go meet someone new at this conference and set up a coffee chat next week."

Deanna Washington Bria Alexander Jon Fukuda Saara Kamppari-Miller Farid Sabitov

Connecting the Ops: Plenary Panel and Closing Circle

September 9, 2022

Aaron Stienstra

"Customer experience cannot truly be good if some are left out or excluded, either intentionally or unintentionally."

Aaron Stienstra Lashanda Hodge

Leveraging Civic Design to Advance Equity and Rebuild Trust in the US Federal Government

December 8, 2021