Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
A Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust
Summary
Quantitative instruments are frequently sought because 1) they can be quickly fielded to lots and lots of people, and 2) when carefully sampled, they can be generalizable to the population of users/customers. However, because many times the focus is on speed to launch because decision-makers need results quickly, there is not much depth given to their development, nor an investigation of the validity evidence. In the session, I will share a framework that centers validity and is necessarily a mixed methods approach to research. I will also share ideas on how to scale the research over time so that findings and insights are able to be iteratively delivered to stakeholders, while also iteratively informing one another in a qual-quant research dance that brings more trustworthy, user-centered evidence to decision-makers. Finally, I will share ideas for a course I am developing for supporting qualitative researchers to become more mixed in their approach.
Key Insights
-
•
Validity involves five evidence sources: content, response processes, internal structure, relations to other variables, and consequences of testing.
-
•
Qualitative methods, especially cognitive interviews, are crucial for understanding how respondents interpret survey items, supporting validity.
-
•
Surveys should be treated as products that need ongoing iteration and testing, not one-off tools.
-
•
Ethical considerations extend beyond data privacy to how survey results affect user experience and product decisions.
-
•
Mixed methods approaches leverage both qualitative insights and quantitative analyses to build a stronger validity argument.
-
•
Breaking down survey validation work across multiple teams and 'bite-sized' efforts makes the process manageable.
-
•
Revising surveys over time to improve validity complicates measuring change longitudinally but increases trustworthiness.
-
•
Stakeholder buy-in improves when validity processes are communicated as phased insights offering tangible results quickly.
-
•
Analyses such as factor analysis and Rasch modeling reveal survey internal structure and help identify item bias across subpopulations.
-
•
It is important to revisit validity considerations continuously, especially after product or user base changes.
Notable Quotes
"Validity is the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores for proposed uses."
"Qualitative research in a mixed methods setting needs to think about validity to support the bigger validity argument."
"What would happen if you do think about validity? Would it change your process or research plans?"
"Surveys are products too, so they need to be iteratively tested."
"You don’t know what you don’t know. Let’s write surveys that cover those blind spots."
"If the survey wording changes, measuring change over time becomes difficult, but improving the survey builds trust."
"Ethical considerations should go beyond typical privacy reviews and think deeply about user impact throughout the process."
"It is better to partner with someone who has quantitative expertise to interpret internal structure analyses."
"Management and stakeholders often care more about getting usable information quickly than understanding the full validity process."
"We can get quick insights in phases to keep teams engaged and slowly build a complete validity argument."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Accessibility defects are bugs. If it’s a P1 blocking bug for an accessibility issue, treat it like any other P1 bug."
Sheri Byrne-HaberAccessibility at Scale
June 9, 2021
"If you skip iterative testing, you risk building features nobody really wants."
Prayag Narula Hannah HudsonEmpowering Designers to do Good Research
March 11, 2022
"If you build something that's easy to use but not what people want, it doesn't matter."
Janelle EstesUX Research Trends
January 28, 2021
"Style guides and embedding content systems into design systems help scale content without bottlenecks."
Craig Brookes Andreas Huebner Morgan Quinn"Just Make it Look Good" and Other Ways We're Misunderstood
June 11, 2021
"Slow and intentional communication allows you to be fully present rather than distracted by constant notifications."
Marc Fonteijn Ru ButlerIncrease your confidence, influence, and impact (through a Professional Community)
December 3, 2024
"Research ops allows me to indulge my geeky planning spreadsheety side as well as my people-loving supportive side — Saskia, Delivery."
Kate TowseyThe State of ResearchOps: More Than Just Theory
June 20, 2019
"Sometimes the entire leadership team quitting at once is a big sign cultural safety is failing."
Alla WeinbergDesign Teams Need Psychological Safety: Here’s How to Create It
September 9, 2022
"We have over 30 contracting teams spread across roughly 10 vendors all working on parts of the veteran experience landscape."
Shawna Hein Kevin HoffmanCreate a Cohesive Civic Design Practice Across Agency, Vendors, and Contracts
November 17, 2022
"You have to look two or three steps ahead so you're not chasing what's right in front of you — avoid target fixation."
Tricia WangSCALE: Discussion
June 15, 2018
