Fair and Effective Designer Evaluation
Summary
How do you evaluate designers fairly and effectively while providing a clear path toward career advancement? This is a question our organization has grappled with throughout our eight years as a company. Design can often be left up to gut reasoning by leadership and designers may not have a clear understanding of what their role means and how they may grow as designers. We’ve developed iterations of different tools and processes over the years to address these concerns and to evolve with our shifting needs as a growing company. All of which has led us to a robust tool that we’ve been using over the past two years which can serve as a model for how organizations can deploy qualitative career advancement. The session will cover our journey to this point and showcase the tools and processes we’ve deployed to make evaluation and career advancement systematic within a design organization along with surprising benefits and lessons we’ve learned along the way.
Key Insights
-
•
Grant Studio’s career path system evaluates designers in craft, quality, client, and team categories to drive well-rounded growth.
-
•
Continuous anonymous feedback after projects keeps evaluation timely and focused on individual goals.
-
•
Performance evaluations happen twice yearly and aggregate feedback from multiple project leads.
-
•
A Google Sheets tool was chosen over commercial software for flexibility and control over the evaluation structure.
-
•
Weighting of evaluation categories varies by role level; craft and quality dominate for designers, client and team for leads.
-
•
Career managers mentor designers and advocate for them in staffing and promotions.
-
•
The system promotes generalists who can work holistically across projects rather than specialists.
-
•
Grant Studio removed the 'studio development' category after realizing designers deprioritized extracurricular activities due to workload.
-
•
There is a recognized challenge in evaluating non-linear career moves and leadership roles within the current linear career path.
-
•
Transparency and collective involvement in the evaluation system foster buy-in and make difficult career conversations fairer.
Notable Quotes
"Evaluations and promotions can be nebulous and awkward, especially in collaborative design work."
"We built a career path to make evaluations as fair and consistent as possible across roles."
"Continuous feedback is anonymous and focused on teammates’ goals to help keep focus on what matters most."
"Our evaluation tool is a Google Sheet so we can quickly make adjustments without being bogged down by unnecessary features."
"The system encourages growth not just in craft but also in client engagement and team collaboration."
"We want to build consultants who can solve problems across a variety of projects and clients."
"Career managers develop close relationships with designers and advocate for staffing and promotions on their behalf."
"We’ve had to retire the studio development category because it wasn’t prioritized due to project work demands."
"The career path shows when someone is ready for promotion, but additional training may be needed to support leadership transitions."
"Transparency is one of our key values, so everyone in the studio was involved in building and maintaining the evaluation system."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"There are no mistakes in jazz, just missed opportunities."
Jim KalbachJazz Improvisation as a Model for Team Collaboration
November 6, 2017
"Evergreen content needs a strong perspective on why the topic matters along with practical examples on how to apply it."
Louis RosenfeldCoffee with Lou: Should You Write a (UX) Book?
March 7, 2024
"Levels can mean really different things at different companies, so ask a lot of questions about expectations for each level."
Catt Small Micah Bennett Brian Carr Jessica HarlleeWhat's Next for ICs: Exploring Staff and Principal Designer Roles
February 22, 2024
"Typically we get stuck answering the questions we know we can answer but lose the chance to see the big picture."
Marieke McCloskeyUser Science: Product Analytics & User Research
March 11, 2021
"If you can’t see a human in a video, how do you know the entire conversation wasn’t fabricated?"
Llewyn Paine[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings
June 5, 2024
"Random assignment to treatment or control is essential—if it’s not random, it’s not a true experiment."
Joshua NobleCasual Inference
October 6, 2023
"Empathy doesn’t come from reading a report—you don’t get close to users by just reading data."
Sara LogelYour Colleagues are Your Users Too
March 29, 2023
"Sponsor sessions may require registration by email to prevent Zoom bombings and protect session integrity."
Bria Alexander Louis RosenfeldWelcome
January 8, 2024
"When you design for the edges, you make things better, more fluid, more customizable for everyone."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
June 7, 2023
