Rosenverse
Fair and Effective Designer Evaluation

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Fair and Effective Designer Evaluation

Gold
Wednesday, September 25, 2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Share the love for this talk
Fair and Effective Designer Evaluation
Speakers: Ignacio Martinez
Link:

Summary

How do you evaluate designers fairly and effectively while providing a clear path toward career advancement? This is a question our organization has grappled with throughout our eight years as a company. Design can often be left up to gut reasoning by leadership and designers may not have a clear understanding of what their role means and how they may grow as designers.

We’ve developed iterations of different tools and processes over the years to address these concerns and to evolve with our shifting needs as a growing company. All of which has led us to a robust tool that we’ve been using over the past two years which can serve as a model for how organizations can deploy qualitative career advancement.

The session will cover our journey to this point and showcase the tools and processes we’ve deployed to make evaluation and career advancement systematic within a design organization along with surprising benefits and lessons we’ve learned along the way.

Key Insights

  • •

    Grant Studio’s career path system evaluates designers in craft, quality, client, and team categories to drive well-rounded growth.

  • •

    Continuous anonymous feedback after projects keeps evaluation timely and focused on individual goals.

  • •

    Performance evaluations happen twice yearly and aggregate feedback from multiple project leads.

  • •

    A Google Sheets tool was chosen over commercial software for flexibility and control over the evaluation structure.

  • •

    Weighting of evaluation categories varies by role level; craft and quality dominate for designers, client and team for leads.

  • •

    Career managers mentor designers and advocate for them in staffing and promotions.

  • •

    The system promotes generalists who can work holistically across projects rather than specialists.

  • •

    Grant Studio removed the 'studio development' category after realizing designers deprioritized extracurricular activities due to workload.

  • •

    There is a recognized challenge in evaluating non-linear career moves and leadership roles within the current linear career path.

  • •

    Transparency and collective involvement in the evaluation system foster buy-in and make difficult career conversations fairer.

Notable Quotes

"Evaluations and promotions can be nebulous and awkward, especially in collaborative design work."

"We built a career path to make evaluations as fair and consistent as possible across roles."

"Continuous feedback is anonymous and focused on teammates’ goals to help keep focus on what matters most."

"Our evaluation tool is a Google Sheet so we can quickly make adjustments without being bogged down by unnecessary features."

"The system encourages growth not just in craft but also in client engagement and team collaboration."

"We want to build consultants who can solve problems across a variety of projects and clients."

"Career managers develop close relationships with designers and advocate for staffing and promotions on their behalf."

"We’ve had to retire the studio development category because it wasn’t prioritized due to project work demands."

"The career path shows when someone is ready for promotion, but additional training may be needed to support leadership transitions."

"Transparency is one of our key values, so everyone in the studio was involved in building and maintaining the evaluation system."

Ask the Rosenbot
Gregg Bernstein
Opportunistic Research with Gregg Bernstein
2019 • Advancing Research Community
Kelly Dern
AI as a Design Partner: How to Get the Most Out of AI Tools to Scale Your Process
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Amelia Cole
Data-Prompted Interviews
2021 • QuantQual Interest Group
Wendy Johansson
Design at Scale: Behind the Scenes
2021 • Enterprise Community
Noel Lamb
Cultivating Business Partnerships to Grow Research Ops
2022 • Advancing Research Community
Roberta Dombrowski
Making Research a Team Sport
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Himanshu Bharadwaj
If design had a heart
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Andreas Huebner
What Is It Like To Be Part of The UX Team at Compass?
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Aras Bilgen
Research Democratization: A Debate
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Sara Conklin
A UXer’s 12-Month Journey from Climate Concern to Climate Credibility
2025 • Climate UX Interest Group
Saara Kamppari-Miller
"Prototype" vs "Prototype"--Breaking Down and Rebuilding Our Understanding of What We Do
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Kat Vellos
Opener: The Other L Word
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Alla Weinberg
Design Teams Need Psychological Safety: Here’s How to Create It
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Andrew Michael
Building a Product Insights Team
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Brianna Sylver
Lead With Purpose
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Dan Saffer
Why AI projects fail (and what we can do about it)
2025 • Rosenfeld Community

More Videos

Corey Long

"Being humble enough to ask a competitor for feedback changed everything and led directly to job offers."

Corey Long

Hiring in DesignOps: A Critical Study on How to Hire and Get Hired

September 23, 2024

Gretchen Anderson

"Pair design is about two perspectives coming together as peers to quickly try and evaluate ideas."

Gretchen Anderson

Scaling the Human Center

June 8, 2017

Lori Muszynski

"Down the road, giving designers room to cross-train across disciplines creates happier, more versatile teams."

Lori Muszynski Peter Merholz

Keeping Design Weird

October 2, 2023

Sam Proulx

"Expert screen reader users listen at over 300 words per minute and still fully understand the content."

Sam Proulx

SUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population

June 9, 2021

Prayag Narula

"Building more ethical, responsible, and humanistic forms of technologies requires diverse and interdisciplinary conversations."

Prayag Narula Rida Qadri

HCI 2.0: Humanity Deserves the Attention that UX Research has to Offer

March 28, 2023

Deanna Smith

"Piloting your ideas before committing helps prevent disruption and saves energy in the long run."

Deanna Smith

Leading Change with Confidence: Strategies for Optimizing Your Process

September 23, 2024

Lija Hogan

"Democratization helps free up researchers by shifting ad hoc research to others."

Lija Hogan

Doing more with more: Lessons from the Front Lines of Democratization

March 9, 2022

Sam Proulx

"The Apple 3GS and the accessibility that was developed by Apple was a massive shift."

Sam Proulx

To Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility

March 11, 2022

Bria Alexander

"You don’t have to take notes; session videos and decks will be shared as soon as possible."

Bria Alexander

Opening Remarks

October 3, 2023