Rosenverse

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

From AI to Zeitgeist: Theory as the design antidote to AI hype

Thursday, March 27, 2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Share the love for this talk
From AI to Zeitgeist: Theory as the design antidote to AI hype
Speakers: Uday Gajendar and Adam Richardson
Link:

Summary

In an environment of UX staff reductions, a focus on tangible design skills and tool expertise, quarterly profits, and angst over what AI means for the future of everyone’s jobs, what place does “theory” have? As designers and researchers we engage in theory every day by hypothesizing: “If we design it like this, then we will have outcome X.” The bigger the problem you’re trying to solve, the more important it becomes to have a theoretical framework about why you’re doing what you’re doing. The breathless parade of AI releases present the biggest challenges (and potential opportunities) in many years. As designers we should have a posture on how to shape how AI is used and its impacts. Much as the mid-century modernists developed coherent frameworks for understanding the relationship between form, function, and human needs, using novel technologies coming out of World War II, we must now articulate theories that help us make sense of this new landscape where intelligence itself has become a design material. Join UX researcher/strategist Adam Richardson and UX design leader Uday Gajendar for an exploration of how we might develop the theoretical foundations designers need to thoughtfully shape AI interactions.

Key Insights

  • Design theory provides a crucial framework to push back against AI hype and ground action in humanistic values.

  • Historical design movements like Arts and Crafts, Modernism, and Mid-century Modernism reflect responses to societal changes, integrating technology with human-centered ideals.

  • UX design originated from longstanding human-computer interaction research and established theories that are currently underutilized.

  • Affordances, once central to usable design, have been diminished in favor of flat aesthetics and revenue-driven incremental improvements.

  • Victor Papanek’s view of design as a liberal art calls for conscientious, sustainable, and socially responsible design against mass consumerism.

  • Design movements must be collective, hopeful, sustainable, and stand for meaningful ideals rather than oppose something or rely solely on individual passion.

  • Skill boot camps and tactical learning alone do not foster critical design movements or sustained impact.

  • Craft in digital design spans trade (making), stage (facilitating discussions), and statecraft (political relationship-building), all essential for successful design initiatives.

  • Systems thinking is needed to comprehend and communicate the cascading effects and trade-offs of AI and design decisions.

  • The presence of the maker's touch, embodying imperfection and care, is a vital human quality at risk of being lost in AI-generated work.

Notable Quotes

"Theory at its most fundamental just means if something A happens, then something B will happen."

"Designers are theorists whether they realize it or not — they create solutions that have intended and unintended consequences."

"Mass production is here to stay; how do we make it more humanistic?"

"Affordances seem to have fallen to the wayside in favor of flat design and revenue optimization."

"A movement needs to stand for something, be collective, hopeful, sustainable, and tangible."

"Skill boot camps don’t create a movement; they’re tactical and don’t provide a cohesive set of ideas."

"Craft means intent and care even in digital products; for example, the bounce animation of Google Maps’ pin shows someone cared."

"Knowledge is the material we’re working with in AI design, not just pixels or code."

"AI-generated imagery feels too shiny and perfect — unlike the human-made objects that carry flaws and presence of the maker."

"Trying to figure all this out in business settings is nearly impossible; we have to step away and foster ongoing conversations."

Ask the Rosenbot
Elizabeth Sklar
Co-creating research enablement with your tech org: a case study
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Conference
Mujtaba Hameed
The new horizon of ethnography: using AI to unlock the full potential of in-person research
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Conference
Edgar Anzaldua Moreno
Using Research to Determine Unique Value Proposition
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Caroline Vize
The State of UX: Five Lessons from 2021 to Accelerate Digital Experience in 2022
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Sam Proulx
Prototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Jamika Burge
Embracing change: Navigating shifting landscapes with compassion and agency
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Rachel Posman
A Closer Look at Team Ops and Product Ops (Two Sides of the DesignOps Coin)
2020 • DesignOps Community
Sam Proulx
Designing For Screen Readers: Understanding the Mental Models and Techniques of Real Users
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Caroline Jarrett
Garbage in, garbage out? Measuring error rates to get ready for AI
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Dave Gray
Liminal Thinking: Sense-making for systems in large organizations
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Mansi Gupta
Women-Centric Research: What, Why, How
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Taiye Akin-Akinyosoye
Amplifying voices and enhancing user research through group interviews
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Sam Ladner
Methodologies: Beyond the interview [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Jackie Ho
Lead Effectively While Preserving Team Autonomy with Growth Boards
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Marina Martin
Lives on the Line: The Stakes of UX at the Scale of Government
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Steve Portigal
War Stories LIVE! Q&A-Discussion
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold

More Videos

Daniel Gloyd

"Design research often acts like scientists with clipboards rather than humans in conversation."

Daniel Gloyd

Designing From the Inside Out: How Method Acting Can Inspire Design Research

February 12, 2026

Deirdre Hirschtritt

"Butter is about consistently showing up and being present so people don’t forget you."

Deirdre Hirschtritt Cesar Paredes Marie Perrot

Research is Only as Good as the Relationships You Build

November 17, 2022

Benjamin Real

"It was like arriving to your home after a long day and just right to rest but at the same time you know you could not wait to continue working."

Benjamin Real

Maturity Models: A Core Tool for Creating a DesignOps Strategy

October 1, 2021

Max Gadney

"Sometimes you need to view your career like an investor, where you invest your time for the kind of impact you want."

Max Gadney Andrea Petrucci Joshua Stehr Hannah Wickes

Assessing UX jobs for impact in climate

August 14, 2024

Lada Gorlenko

"Seb is career UXer fresh at Canadian railways with a steep learning curve."

Lada Gorlenko

Theme 1: Intro

January 8, 2024

Feyikemi Akinwolemiwa

"Play is known to create psychological safety, break down barriers, and foster shared alignment."

Feyikemi Akinwolemiwa

Play to innovate: How curiosity and experimentation transform UX

March 11, 2026

Bria Alexander

"If you want to participate in the conference’s general vibe and community, it is essential to join Slack."

Bria Alexander

Opening Remarks

March 29, 2023

Llewyn Paine

"Ultimately, AI avatar tools offer UX teams options to keep recordings while meeting legal compliance."

Llewyn Paine

[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings

June 5, 2024

Bria Alexander

"Accessibility is a great example where OKRs can unify multiple product and design teams to a non-negotiable standard."

Bria Alexander Benson Low Natalya Pemberton Stephanie Goldthorpe

OKRs—Helpful or Harmful?

January 20, 2022