Learning from journalism: Balancing impactful communication with compassionate storytelling
This video is featured in the PDI 2026 playlist.
Summary
Making insight heard and acted upon is a persistent challenge for researchers, but adjacent fields, particularly journalism, have long mastered the balance between impactful communication and compassionate storytelling. We will explore how these practices can elevate researchers’ ability to amplify the voices of the communities they represent, helping their insights cut through the noise.
Key Insights
-
•
Traditional academic and marketing writing styles often bury key research findings, making communication less effective.
-
•
The inverted pyramid model orders information from most to least important, prioritizing key insights upfront.
-
•
Journalistic writing techniques can help UX researchers communicate more clearly and gain stakeholder trust.
-
•
Ranking and physically organizing findings from most to least important helps clarify presentation priorities.
-
•
User stories and anecdotes woven alongside key research points increase engagement and empathy.
-
•
Using simple grammar, active voice, and plain language improves comprehension without oversimplifying content.
-
•
Context and methodological details are better placed later or in appendices to avoid overwhelming audiences.
-
•
Authentic writing voice, balancing professionalism with personal tone, makes reports more relatable and memorable.
-
•
Change toward clearer communication is a gradual process requiring stakeholder education and support.
-
•
Bruce is skeptical about current AI’s ability to write with true human clarity and warmth.
Notable Quotes
"Communicating in an academic or marketing way builds suspense instead of building trust."
"The inverted pyramid shares details in descending order of importance so key information comes first."
"If someone only reads the first few paragraphs or attends the first 10 minutes, they should still get the key takeaways."
"Using the inverted pyramid doesn’t mean dumbing down your findings, it means explaining complex issues clearly."
"Rank your information physically from most important to least important to gain clarity."
"Weave in great user stories that exemplify your key points to maximize engagement."
"Write grammatically simple sentences with fewer commas and use the active voice to improve clarity."
"Choose plain, everyday words over jargon to meet your audience where they are."
"Sounding authentically like you, while professional, is more engaging than robotic business writing."
"It’s worth explaining your new communication approach to stakeholders to save their time and foster discussion."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The outcome of this method really makes the difference between lightning and a lightning bug."
Anne MamaghaniHow Your Organization's Generative Workshops Are Probably Going Wrong and How to Get Them Right
March 28, 2023
"This is a story about what happens when you stop trying to will others to think like you and start creating conditions under which both frames can coexist productively."
Kurt McCullochFaster alone, further together: Rebuilding collaboration in the age of AI research
March 10, 2026
"Working at a government institution isn’t linear. Some projects might work out. Some simply won’t."
Sofía Delsordo Kassim VeraPublic Policy for Jalisco's Designers to Make Design Matter
December 8, 2021
"What responsibility do we have for creating the situation? What agency do we have for making it better?"
Christian CrumlishIntroduction by our Conference Chair
December 6, 2022
"Many times when planning to hire, we first assess our team competencies to identify the necessary talent."
Ebru NamaldiDesigning the Designer’s Journey: Scaling Teams, Culture, and Growth Through DesignOps
September 11, 2025
"Design shares are more about presenting finished work and practice defending it, not about peer-to-peer feedback."
Joseph MeersmanSweating the Pixel: Scaling Quality through Critique
June 10, 2021
"The challenge is co-developing a custom investment model that alters decision making based on portfolio logic rather than project-based thinking."
Milan Guenther Benjamin KumpfThe $212 billion ‘so what?’: unlocking impact in development cooperation
November 20, 2025
"If you have to choose between doing bad research or no research at all, you’re better off not doing it — Lisa Reichelt."
Kathleen AsjesResearch Democratization: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
March 10, 2022
"LLMs talk the talk but don’t understand the meaning. They’re master impersonators without true knowledge."
Josh Clark Veronika KindredSentient Design, AI, and the Radically Adaptive Experience (1st of 3 seminars)
January 15, 2025