Out of the FOG: A Non-traditional Research Approach to Alignment
Summary
Product teams, including those I work with, struggle to overcome the grinding momentum of product delivery timelines to make room for adequate discovery, learning, and application through research. The game of product development becomes fiercer when it's not the first time, but the fourth team assembled to tackle a complex product space. In well-trod territory, strong opinions may abound, and talking past each other and rehashing approaches is rampant. Challenges that face researchers as partners in product development include establishing a sense of shared team vision, separating facts from fiction, and moving the team past hang-ups to establish a research strategy and product direction. This case introduces the idea of "grinding momentum" and outlines a stakeholder engagement process known as a FOG session that helps all team members across functional expertise areas claim voice, hear others, and share in collective aha moments that define next steps. Using a mixed-methods approach, a process is outlined to frameshift the value of existing knowledge spanning many departments within an organization, bring together distinct expertise vocabularies and analyses, and propel product partners to identify true knowledge gaps.
Key Insights
-
•
Research is often perceived as slow but actually enables faster product velocity by clarifying decisions.
-
•
Daniel Kahneman’s System 1 (intuitive) and System 2 (analytical) thinking both complement each other in decision-making.
-
•
Expert intuition requires regularity, practice, and immediate feedback to be reliable, conditions rarely met in novel product contexts.
-
•
Organizations mature in information processing by adding departments: starting with intuition (product teams), then data, and finally research teams for deeper analysis.
-
•
Product teams often over-rely on intuitive thinking, leading to overconfidence and misalignment.
-
•
Grinding momentum is a shared team pressure to move fast without adequate foundational knowledge, risking poor decisions.
-
•
The FOG method (Facts, Opinions, Guesses) helps teams slow down, separate evidence from assumptions, and surface knowledge gaps.
-
•
Facilitated FOG sessions enable democratic participation, uncover tensions, and establish shared mental models for product direction.
-
•
Research should be positioned as a partner in knowledge creation rather than an arbiter of absolute truth, shifting power dynamics.
-
•
Dealing with bad data or assumed facts requires active researcher intervention to analyze artifacts and reframe discussions constructively.
Notable Quotes
"Slowing down with research can help us move faster overall."
"Intuition is knowing without knowing how you know, I just know it."
"Expert intuition can be right or wrong because it relies on cues and heuristics in uncertain contexts."
"Research is the most analytical form of information processing because it involves active knowledge generation."
"Most product decisions look intuitive, but intuition alone leads to coherent stories that can be wrong."
"Research is sometimes perceived as intuitive and therefore dismissed as insufficient for decision-making."
"Grinding momentum is a shared mental model that pushes teams to decide quickly without shared foundational knowledge."
"The FOG method helps teams separate facts from fiction and move past hangups toward alignment."
"The goal is to turn research into a partner in shared discovery, not just an arbiter of truth."
"If a stakeholder claims something is a fact without evidence, it is our responsibility as researchers to challenge and unpack that."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"You can’t know a human honestly from the outside alone; you have to let their reality work on you."
Daniel GloydDesigning From the Inside Out: How Method Acting Can Inspire Design Research
February 12, 2026
"Inviting leaders to shadow research sessions helped one department hire a client feedback panel representing marginalized voices."
Deirdre Hirschtritt Cesar Paredes Marie PerrotResearch is Only as Good as the Relationships You Build
November 17, 2022
"The model was the work of everybody, it was not just my job."
Benjamin RealMaturity Models: A Core Tool for Creating a DesignOps Strategy
October 1, 2021
"Not all climate jobs have digital outputs, so don’t waste your time chasing digital roles in fields like green concrete."
Max Gadney Andrea Petrucci Joshua Stehr Hannah WickesAssessing UX jobs for impact in climate
August 14, 2024
"Leading change in a century-old company is a very different challenge."
Lada GorlenkoTheme 1: Intro
January 8, 2024
"Play disrupts hierarchy, which is why it helps teams stuck in defensiveness to move forward."
Feyikemi AkinwolemiwaPlay to innovate: How curiosity and experimentation transform UX
March 11, 2026
"Lauren Cantor keeps all those links and other resources so we don’t have to be googling while listening."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
March 29, 2023
"Ultimately, AI avatar tools offer UX teams options to keep recordings while meeting legal compliance."
Llewyn Paine[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings
June 5, 2024
"Junior engineers often resent having to create OKRs that feel disconnected from their day-to-day work."
Bria Alexander Benson Low Natalya Pemberton Stephanie GoldthorpeOKRs—Helpful or Harmful?
January 20, 2022
