Rosenverse
Out of the FOG: A Non-traditional Research Approach to Alignment

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Out of the FOG: A Non-traditional Research Approach to Alignment

Gold
Tuesday, March 28, 2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Share the love for this talk
Out of the FOG: A Non-traditional Research Approach to Alignment
Speakers: Kristen Guth, Ph.D.
Link:

Summary

Product teams, including those I work with, struggle to overcome the grinding momentum of product delivery timelines to make room for adequate discovery, learning, and application through research. The game of product development becomes fiercer when it's not the first time, but the fourth team assembled to tackle a complex product space. In well-trod territory, strong opinions may abound, and talking past each other and rehashing approaches is rampant. Challenges that face researchers as partners in product development include establishing a sense of shared team vision, separating facts from fiction, and moving the team past hang-ups to establish a research strategy and product direction. This case introduces the idea of "grinding momentum" and outlines a stakeholder engagement process known as a FOG session that helps all team members across functional expertise areas claim voice, hear others, and share in collective aha moments that define next steps. Using a mixed-methods approach, a process is outlined to frameshift the value of existing knowledge spanning many departments within an organization, bring together distinct expertise vocabularies and analyses, and propel product partners to identify true knowledge gaps.

Key Insights

  • •

    Research is often perceived as slow but actually enables faster product velocity by clarifying decisions.

  • •

    Daniel Kahneman’s System 1 (intuitive) and System 2 (analytical) thinking both complement each other in decision-making.

  • •

    Expert intuition requires regularity, practice, and immediate feedback to be reliable, conditions rarely met in novel product contexts.

  • •

    Organizations mature in information processing by adding departments: starting with intuition (product teams), then data, and finally research teams for deeper analysis.

  • •

    Product teams often over-rely on intuitive thinking, leading to overconfidence and misalignment.

  • •

    Grinding momentum is a shared team pressure to move fast without adequate foundational knowledge, risking poor decisions.

  • •

    The FOG method (Facts, Opinions, Guesses) helps teams slow down, separate evidence from assumptions, and surface knowledge gaps.

  • •

    Facilitated FOG sessions enable democratic participation, uncover tensions, and establish shared mental models for product direction.

  • •

    Research should be positioned as a partner in knowledge creation rather than an arbiter of absolute truth, shifting power dynamics.

  • •

    Dealing with bad data or assumed facts requires active researcher intervention to analyze artifacts and reframe discussions constructively.

Notable Quotes

"Slowing down with research can help us move faster overall."

"Intuition is knowing without knowing how you know, I just know it."

"Expert intuition can be right or wrong because it relies on cues and heuristics in uncertain contexts."

"Research is the most analytical form of information processing because it involves active knowledge generation."

"Most product decisions look intuitive, but intuition alone leads to coherent stories that can be wrong."

"Research is sometimes perceived as intuitive and therefore dismissed as insufficient for decision-making."

"Grinding momentum is a shared mental model that pushes teams to decide quickly without shared foundational knowledge."

"The FOG method helps teams separate facts from fiction and move past hangups toward alignment."

"The goal is to turn research into a partner in shared discovery, not just an arbiter of truth."

"If a stakeholder claims something is a fact without evidence, it is our responsibility as researchers to challenge and unpack that."

Ask the Rosenbot
Frances Yllana
DesignOps–Leading the Path to Parity
2023 • DesignOps Community
Amelia Cole
Data-Prompted Interviews
2021 • QuantQual Interest Group
Laine Riley Prokay
Carving a Path for Early Career DesignOps Practitioners
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Dawn Ressel
Full-Stack User Experiences: A Marriage of Design and Technology
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Dave Malouf
Panel: Design Systems and Documentation
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold
Michael Land
Establishing Design Operations in Government
2021 • DesignOps Community
Laura Smith
Embedding Service Design and Agile Practice within UK Planning Teams to Create Services that Last
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Jon White
Unsticking Research for Better Information Flow
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Bill Scott
Lean Engineering: Engineering for Learning and Experimentation in the Enterprise
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Ovetta Sampson
Managing the Human Engagement Risks of AI
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Sarah Gallimore
Inspire Progress with Artifacts from the Future
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Russell Blair
Killing the blank page
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Dan Willis
Enterprise Storytelling Sessions
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Fisayo Osilaja
[Demo] The AI edge: From researcher to strategist
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Sheri Byrne-Haber
Accessibility at Scale
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Robert Fabricant
Shifting dynamics: The evolving relationship between researchers, participants, and organizational systems
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold

More Videos

Mark Interrante

"AI can accelerate prioritization tasks, but the final judgment must come from humans who understand context."

Mark Interrante Harry Max

AI for Prioritization (3rd of 3 seminars)

July 11, 2024

Patrizia Bertini

"The accessibility expert was simply lost into shouting, we must be accessible without creating a strategy."

Patrizia Bertini

The (r)evolution of designOps: It’s Time to Think (really) BIG

September 11, 2025

Shan Shen

"Sometimes you have to insist on the correct terms that are widely recognized and consistently used."

Shan Shen

Translating UX Terms into Business Contexts

November 29, 2023

Adam Thomas

"If you’re not investing or quitting something, what is the point of having a strategy?"

Adam Thomas

Survival Metrics – Making Change in a Fast, Data-Informed, and Politically Safe Way

December 6, 2022

Robin Beers

"Research really is the most predictive practice an organization has — we are the only ones who can really predict the future."

Robin Beers

Research as a Catalyst for Organizational Transformation

March 12, 2021

Sheri Byrne-Haber

"If you’re rewarding designers for delivering on time, great, but if you reward them for delivering accessible products on time, you’ll get better results."

Sheri Byrne-Haber

Accessibility at Scale

June 9, 2021

Joseph Meersman

"Critiques help teams stop being the lone ranger and instead iterate faster together with purpose and clarity."

Joseph Meersman

Sweating the Pixel: Scaling Quality through Critique

June 10, 2021

Deanna Washington

"Saying no with intentionality and clear guidelines creates clarity and focus."

Deanna Washington Bria Alexander Jon Fukuda Saara Kamppari-Miller Farid Sabitov

Connecting the Ops: Plenary Panel and Closing Circle

September 9, 2022

Aaron Stienstra

"Civic designers are in a privileged position; with privilege comes the power to empower the voices of those we serve."

Aaron Stienstra Lashanda Hodge

Leveraging Civic Design to Advance Equity and Rebuild Trust in the US Federal Government

December 8, 2021