Oxbows, Rivers, and Estuaries: How to navigate the currents of change (without burning out)
Summary
For those of us in roles that aim to link experiences, see things end-to-end, or understand systems as ecosystems, the constant currents of change can make it feel like we’re endlessly adapting just to keep up. We long for a stable point of definition and clarity amid all this motion. In this talk, I’ll draw from my experience across various roles and companies to help you recognize and navigate the broader forces shaping our related fields. Using metaphors like oxbows, rivers, and estuaries, and with practical examples, I’ll share tactics for navigating change with intention, helping you stay grounded in the long game while seizing “act now” opportunities.
Key Insights
-
•
Integrative roles such as service design, product management, and UX research face unique boundary-spanning challenges involving complex cognitive and emotional labor.
-
•
Organizational maturity is nonlinear; fast-moving, product-led companies and slower, service-design-mature companies have complementary strengths.
-
•
There is a widespread 'battle of models' as different teams create overlapping sense-making frameworks like journey maps, value streams, and architectural diagrams.
-
•
Trying to force one unified model across an organization is typically ineffective; embracing diverse models and finding commonalities is more productive.
-
•
The river metaphor (water, obstacles, route, markers, safety) is powerful for understanding how to read and navigate organizational change currents.
-
•
Oxbow lakes metaphor warns that pushing hard in one direction can isolate teams or disciplines when larger economic or organizational 'floods' reshape the context.
-
•
Estuaries metaphor highlights the creative potential at boundaries where different disciplines and perspectives mix, but also the sensitivity and fragility of such ecosystems.
-
•
Patient opportunism—choosing when to leverage currents and when to push against them—is critical to long-term success and avoiding burnout in integrative roles.
-
•
Many key decisions impacting customer experience happen in engineering or architecture teams that may not traditionally include service design participation.
-
•
Perceptions of progress can be skewed; although some disciplines feel stagnated, other evolving disciplines offer opportunities for collaboration and innovation.
Notable Quotes
"You have to go from being able to deliver a message in three bullets and then turn around in the next moment and deliver a massive service blueprint or customer journey."
"Maturity is not linear; the tanker company had a lot to learn from the speedboat, and vice versa."
"Everyone is circling around similar topics but in very different ways—there’s a battle of models but more similarities than differences."
"Sometimes leaders focus so much on scanning the river they’re not observing the surroundings—the banks tell you if the river is deep or shallow."
"If you need to cross a dangerous river, you don’t paddle straight into it; you use the opposing force of the river to move forward."
"Trying to force one preeminent model for the company is a recipe for disaster—embrace models and understand why people are using them."
"It is impossible to survive in this industry by pushing against the current all the time; you must put yourself in positions to leverage the current."
"Some of the most important decisions for service design happen on whiteboards among engineers, often without service design representation."
"The estuary is highly resilient but also very sensitive to industrial waste—creative collaboration areas in organizations are similar."
"Patient opportunism means most of the time having the current at your back and only occasionally angling directly against it to avoid burnout."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Having big ears means listening more to others than to yourself during a performance."
Jim KalbachJazz Improvisation as a Model for Team Collaboration
November 6, 2017
"We look to work with authors we like and enjoy being around because writing a book is a long, collaborative journey."
Louis RosenfeldCoffee with Lou: Should You Write a (UX) Book?
March 7, 2024
"The difference between director and principal often lies in whether you’re inspired more by leading people or focused on outputs and craft."
Catt Small Micah Bennett Brian Carr Jessica HarlleeWhat's Next for ICs: Exploring Staff and Principal Designer Roles
February 22, 2024
"Sharing your research skills broadly within your company can create unexpected opportunities to improve experiences."
Marieke McCloskeyUser Science: Product Analytics & User Research
March 11, 2021
"Ultimately, AI avatar tools offer UX teams options to keep recordings while meeting legal compliance."
Llewyn Paine[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings
June 5, 2024
"Qualitative reasoning about causal mechanisms usually comes from lived experience, either the researcher or participants."
Joshua NobleCasual Inference
October 6, 2023
"Empathy doesn’t come from reading a report—you don’t get close to users by just reading data."
Sara LogelYour Colleagues are Your Users Too
March 29, 2023
"This is the same conference in so many good ways — good ways are that it’s resilient and there’s a certain steadiness."
Bria Alexander Louis RosenfeldWelcome
January 8, 2024
"More ways to contact support—chat, email, phone—are essential because different disabilities require different options."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
June 7, 2023