Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Research in the Face of Complexity: New Sensibility for New Situations
Summary
How we design and deliver products is changing; how research plays is following suit. Our environment is complex, and evolving. AI’s role in design, product, research, and engineering is accelerating. New practices are shifting the boundaries between our functions. Strategic research programs play outside of functional lines, working with the fabric product development and the needs of different teams and situations. We shift our focus from tuning and scaling the research machine, towards tending the garden of shared understanding and possibility. In this session, we’ll explore paths for research practitioners and programs who want to operate effectively in uncertainty. We’ll discuss how complexity informs research strategy, and look at activity in the organization through lenses that create new opportunities for the research practice.
Key Insights
-
•
Most product organizations operate within complex adaptive systems, not predictable or purely complicated environments.
-
•
Traditional research projects that produce isolated insights often fail to impact product outcomes effectively.
-
•
Managing emergence—the unpredictable unfolding of outcomes—should be a core research focus rather than just delivering findings.
-
•
Dave Snowden’s Cynefin framework helps distinguish domains: clear, complicated, complex, and chaotic, with complexity being the key challenge for product teams.
-
•
Using vineyard management as a metaphor highlights that contextual factors drastically affect outcomes, meaning research approaches must be tailored per team context.
-
•
Direct actions or recommendations in complex systems rarely achieve desired outcomes without managing interactions and relationships.
-
•
Research democratization is promising but needs nuanced, context-specific approaches rather than one-size-fits-all solutions.
-
•
Tools like AIMS (Acting, Interactions, Monitors, Scaffolding) provide ways to intervene thoughtfully in complex adaptive systems.
-
•
Continuous agile cycles can be limiting for research; longer, consultative, and milestone-based approaches may be required to handle complexity.
-
•
Building trust and relationships, especially for remote researchers, is crucial to gaining access and influence within complex teams.
Notable Quotes
"Research alone is insufficient to solve complex organizational problems; it’s more about learning how to work with the teams and complexity."
"Helping teams is much more like managing a children’s party than engineering a bridge."
"If you want to grow good grapes, you need to manage the vineyard well—but every vineyard has different demands due to its context."
"Direct action rarely gets what we want in complex systems; instead, we must know what we can actually manage."
"Introducing insights into a system is just adding a new actor; without managing interactions, nothing changes."
"Democratization of research is interesting but not a one-size-fits-all; it needs quick assessment of what a team truly needs."
"Monitoring for weak signals and early signs of emergence is as important as intervention itself."
"Putting scaffolding in place helps self-organization in complexity—like training wires in vineyards or using shared maps in teams."
"Most research methods come from an engineering mindset suitable for complicated problems, but product problems are mostly complex."
"Working with complexity requires maintaining ambiguity as long as possible before converging on action."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The outcome of this method really makes the difference between lightning and a lightning bug."
Anne MamaghaniHow Your Organization's Generative Workshops Are Probably Going Wrong and How to Get Them Right
March 28, 2023
"When you boil down all the research into actions someone might take, the thing that made our research valuable in the first place, understanding context, was all gone."
Kurt McCullochFaster alone, further together: Rebuilding collaboration in the age of AI research
March 10, 2026
"Imagine a world where the government prototypes and iterates the whole time."
Sofía Delsordo Kassim VeraPublic Policy for Jalisco's Designers to Make Design Matter
December 8, 2021
"I myself career-wise went over to the dark side and became a product manager."
Christian CrumlishIntroduction by our Conference Chair
December 6, 2022
"Design ops is a way to care for the people who design."
Ebru NamaldiDesigning the Designer’s Journey: Scaling Teams, Culture, and Growth Through DesignOps
September 11, 2025
"An ad hoc critique is best when guard is down, it’s quick, time-sensitive, and helps share early to avoid costly late feedback."
Joseph MeersmanSweating the Pixel: Scaling Quality through Critique
June 10, 2021
"When we showed the Iceland Ministry of Foreign Affairs their portfolio, the Foreign Minister said, we have to pivot our innovation investments to early-stage catalytic innovations."
Milan Guenther Benjamin KumpfThe $212 billion ‘so what?’: unlocking impact in development cooperation
November 20, 2025
"Research democratization rarely frees up strategic research time; it often increases facilitation and ops work."
Kathleen AsjesResearch Democratization: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
March 10, 2022
"Typing prompts is not the UX of the future. Integration into the interactive context where you work is better."
Josh Clark Veronika KindredSentient Design, AI, and the Radically Adaptive Experience (1st of 3 seminars)
January 15, 2025
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How can large enterprises design pilot programs that effectively test new research tools without excessive delays?
What are the benefits of linking AI-powered research repositories with tools like Slack for organizational adoption?
What unique features does the Rosenbot chatbot provide for UX learners?