Coexisting with AI: A practical guide for researchers to navigate tools, ethics, and integration
This video is featured in the PDI 2026 playlist.
Summary
As culture and technology evolve, researchers must learn to co-exist with AI. Understanding its benefits, limitations, and ethical challenges is essential. This guide offers practical insights on top AI tools, advice on when and how to integrate AI into workflows, and a balanced view of the good, the bad and the ugly of the current AI landscape.
Key Insights
-
•
AI is shifting the authoritative voice in research from humans to generative models, challenging researchers’ traditional value.
-
•
Framing research value by sheer output risks commoditizing the field and losing long-term business impact.
-
•
Measuring research impact through concrete business outcomes is harder but essential for sustaining researcher relevance.
-
•
Research integrity is at risk if AI adoption isn't rigorously tested, as stakeholders expect researchers to model best practices.
-
•
AI tools can introduce biases especially affecting marginalized groups, impacting fairness in user research.
-
•
User researchers’ specialized skills in navigating complex trade-offs uniquely position them to integrate AI responsibly.
-
•
The lack of standardized methods for using AI in social science research makes learning from engineers and scientists critical.
-
•
Human data collection remains irreplaceable due to AI's weaknesses in understanding niche cultures and novel insights.
-
•
AI enables researchers to extend beyond study execution into prototyping, impact tracing, and direct product decision influence.
-
•
The rise of AI-powered 'triple threat' researchers combines research, product management, and design augmented by AI capabilities.
Notable Quotes
"Right now, there’s a fear of being replaced by AI, and while a lot of that’s overblown, researchers have a legitimate reason to feel uncomfortable."
"The choices we make about AI are about much more than speed versus quality — they define how we value research and our relationships."
"Volume is a losing game because we cannot outcompete full AI automation for sheer speed and quantity of insights."
"If we want our value to be defined as anything other than studies run, we must learn how to trace and articulate the actual business impact."
"If we are haphazard about AI adoption and trust marketers over rigorous testing, it looks like all our hand wringing about research accuracy was just gatekeeping."
"Generative AI is non-deterministic and doesn’t understand meaning, so baseline error rates exist in all tools we use."
"Prompting is a specialized skill, just like statistics or in-depth interviewing; the wrong wording can bias your results."
"More than a third of content on social media sites is AI generated, creating a training problem for new AI models."
"AI can empower researchers to solve pain points — like anticipating trends or critiquing discussion guides — amplifying impact rather than replacing work."
"We should think of AI as something that amplifies what we already are: if we think research is about impact, AI will help us understand and track it."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We have never played together before and never rehearsed, yet we pulled off a great rendition spontaneously."
Jim KalbachJazz Improvisation as a Model for Team Collaboration
November 6, 2017
"Don’t write a book expecting to retire on royalties; this is a specialized field with modest sales."
Louis RosenfeldCoffee with Lou: Should You Write a (UX) Book?
March 7, 2024
"I kind of think of it one as like fields of influence — staff influences the team or pillar, principal influences organization-wide."
Catt Small Micah Bennett Brian Carr Jessica HarlleeWhat's Next for ICs: Exploring Staff and Principal Designer Roles
February 22, 2024
"I invited Mark to a user interview — he had no idea interviewing wasn’t for him but respected that skill deeply."
Marieke McCloskeyUser Science: Product Analytics & User Research
March 11, 2021
"Synthetic duplicates living on after data deletion raise ethical questions about users’ right to be forgotten."
Llewyn Paine[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings
June 5, 2024
"Difference-in-differences lets you study treatment effects in groups that start in very different places by looking at trends."
Joshua NobleCasual Inference
October 6, 2023
"We need to think about who we’re sharing with, how they might react, and what motivates them."
Sara LogelYour Colleagues are Your Users Too
March 29, 2023
"There will be session notes and sketch notes so you don’t have to take notes yourself unless you want to."
Bria Alexander Louis RosenfeldWelcome
January 8, 2024
"Timely interactions that log users out without saving progress cause abandonment, especially for people with disabilities."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
June 7, 2023
