When Thought-worlds Collide: Collaborating Between Research and Practice
Summary
When ‘thought worlds’ collide, what can we do to better understand and support each other? This talk answers the question by taking a closer look at the differences and similarities between research and practice, and offering lessons learned about communication and collaboration within diverse product teams made up of a mix of academic and professional disciplines.
Key Insights
-
•
The research-practice gap exists not just between academia and industry but also among different research layers like academic, applied, and design research.
-
•
Academics focus on advancing knowledge often without immediate practical impact, while industry prioritizes delivering value quickly and actionably.
-
•
Researchers and practitioners frequently fail to engage or communicate on platforms like Twitter, contributing to mutual isolation.
-
•
Translating complex academic findings into accessible, actionable language significantly improves their usability for designers.
-
•
The timing of delivering research resources is crucial; designers seek different information at different phases of the design process.
-
•
Combining research dissemination with marketing strategies and knowing your audience increases the effectiveness of communication.
-
•
Interdisciplinary teams benefit from starting conversations with personal introductions and goals before diving into business discussions.
-
•
Conflict in teams is inevitable but manageable by steering it into constructive debate and fostering psychological safety.
-
•
Self-awareness about how one debates and communicates disagreement improves team dynamics and outcomes.
-
•
Personal identity and relationships deeply influence how one navigates and bridges gaps between different professional and cultural worlds.
Notable Quotes
"My talk is about being misunderstood and navigating an identity crisis."
"What exactly did you observe that makes you say that? What past experience let you think that way?"
"The research-practice gap frustrates me, and I try to bridge it when it makes sense to."
"Science doesn’t just check truth; it has to win hearts and minds."
"Design has to be fast, accessible, actionable, and intuitive, whereas science is often slow and hard to act on."
"If you want to prove someone wrong, you’re actually not seeing the person in front of you."
"Teams with different thought worlds should start with who they are, what their roles are, and their passions inside and outside work."
"Strong teams are self-aware of how they communicate disagreement and interpret others."
"It’s our job to see the person in front of us, and if that means having an uncomfortable conversation, have that conversation."
"As you touch a human soul, be just another human soul."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Think of AI not as a magic eight ball, but as a highly educated intern that can help with routine tasks."
Mark Interrante Harry MaxAI for Prioritization (3rd of 3 seminars)
July 11, 2024
"Next year we need to have an accessibility budget. You do what you want, but that's the choice."
Patrizia BertiniThe (r)evolution of designOps: It’s Time to Think (really) BIG
September 11, 2025
"Not knowing what something is called or what a newly inflated word means introduces confusion and causes people to talk across purposes."
Shan ShenTranslating UX Terms into Business Contexts
November 29, 2023
"60 to 90% of our ideas do not improve the metrics they were intended to improve."
Adam ThomasSurvival Metrics – Making Change in a Fast, Data-Informed, and Politically Safe Way
December 6, 2022
"Experiential significance is that moment in research when something just hits you as really important and impossible to ignore."
Robin BeersResearch as a Catalyst for Organizational Transformation
March 12, 2021
"Keeping something cloud-based accessible is the most complicated because of hundreds of releases per day in continuous integration."
Sheri Byrne-HaberAccessibility at Scale
June 9, 2021
"People were sweating their pixels, but doing so inside of solos and personal barriers until we started critiquing transparently together."
Joseph MeersmanSweating the Pixel: Scaling Quality through Critique
June 10, 2021
"You gotta write that charter to get clarity with your team."
Deanna Washington Bria Alexander Jon Fukuda Saara Kamppari-Miller Farid SabitovConnecting the Ops: Plenary Panel and Closing Circle
September 9, 2022
"We built an equity learning community with 25 virtual sessions, 4 interagency roundtables, and one-on-one consultations with 37 agencies."
Aaron Stienstra Lashanda HodgeLeveraging Civic Design to Advance Equity and Rebuild Trust in the US Federal Government
December 8, 2021
