Day 1 Panel
Summary
In this panel discussion, Lisa Welchman, Kenneth Bowles, and Dan Rosenberg delved into the evolving role of designers in the age of AI, emphasizing ethical responsibility and the societal impact of design decisions. Kenneth Bowles highlighted the dual nature of responsibility in design—both backward-looking accountability and forward-looking duty—calling for designers to consider not just users but broader social and environmental stakeholders. Dan Rosenberg raised concerns about the ‘faith in the black box’ of AI and the upstream governance needed to prevent harm. The panelists debated the risk of AI commoditizing design roles and disintermediating human judgment. Lisa urged designers to assert agency, understand business deeply, and resist passivity, arguing for bolder engagement with tech’s ethical trajectories. They stressed that human judgment and empathy remain irreplaceable, especially in complex fields like healthcare. The importance of collaboration across silos and anticipatory design to manage AI’s unpredictable error states was also discussed. The panel concluded with encouragement to designers to deepen tech literacy, engage in ethical mitigation early, and shape AI’s future rather than passively accept it.
Key Insights
-
•
Design responsibility extends beyond users to society, environment, and the profession itself, demanding broader ethical consideration.
-
•
AI introduces a risk of commoditizing design work, particularly routine interface tasks that AI can automate within 12 to 36 months.
-
•
Human judgment remains critical and must not be ceded to AI, especially for discriminatory decisions and ethical complexities.
-
•
Understanding and linking design work to business strategy and value is essential for designers to maintain influence at the C-suite level.
-
•
Designers have significant agency but must proactively engage with AI technologies to shape their trajectory rather than resist passively.
-
•
Cross-disciplinary collaboration, especially between designers and data scientists, is necessary but challenged by entrenched organizational silos.
-
•
Designers should anticipate and design for AI error states, recognizing generative AI’s infinite unpredictability.
-
•
Techno-determinism is a pervasive risk; designers must challenge the inevitability mindset by actively influencing AI's ethical direction now.
-
•
Empathy and the embodied human experience are unique human factors that AI may fake but cannot replicate authentically.
-
•
Elevating UX roles upstream into product strategy and business leadership can help protect against devaluation due to AI automation.
Notable Quotes
"Designers have obligations not just to users but also to society and our own profession."
"We often point fingers at the person making the most money from the mess that designers put through the system."
"Faith in the black box makes me uneasy; as designers, we must care about what happens behind the scenes."
"I don’t think any designers today would hand over judgmental decisions fully to AI."
"If you don’t understand business, you don’t deserve a seat at the C-suite table."
"People remember how you made them feel, and that’s something AI can fake but not truly replicate."
"The risk is that AI will cut designers out of decision making because it’s perceived as cheaper or faster."
"Middle management often blocks collaboration despite desires from people underneath to work together."
"We need to design for the many error states generative AI can produce, however unpredictable."
"Technology does not have a mind of its own; people with power set its trajectory and we can influence that."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Reading books and articles is no longer central for many young people. What will replace books and articles for collective knowledge building?"
Nathan Shedroff Hugh Dubberly Thomas J. McLeishHow Will Design be Taught When the Schools Shut Down?
May 8, 2026
"Tracking and capturing the work can be a whole new work in itself. People will naturally abandon complicated process."
John Paul de Guzman10k Screens Later: How We Became a Data-Driven Design Organization
September 24, 2024
"Simplicity can be a differentiator, as shown by Tally, which gained traction as a free, easy form builder."
Aleksandra Korczynska Caroline Jarrett Justyna ParmeeSurvey Tools
March 12, 2026
"Sustainable and flexible work tactics are key to navigating constant change without burnout."
Kristin SkinnerTheme 2: Introduction and Provocation
January 8, 2024
"Design by means letting the people we serve lead the process and ourselves to drop our egos and let go."
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW Victor Udoewa Jennifer StricklandEverything You Need to Know about the Civic Design 2022 Call for Presentations
May 17, 2022
"To do this work, you can’t do it with a JIRA ticket."
Uday GajendarThe Rise of Meta-Design: A Starter Playbook
May 19, 2022
"Strong teams don't serve weak feedback."
Vanessa VarinFeedback: The Other F-Word
September 10, 2025
"Horst Rittel introduced wicked problems to describe problems where consensus on definition is difficult, and calling them problems can be misleading—maybe they’re better called messes or tangles."
Hugh DubberlyProblems with Problems: Reconsidering the Frame of Designing as Problem-Solving
June 19, 2019
"Research isn't about collecting insights, it’s about shaping how teams think."
Sean McKayCoexisting with non-researchers: Practical strategies for a democratized research future
March 11, 2025
