Rosenverse
Journeying toward AI-assisted documentation in healthcare

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Journeying toward AI-assisted documentation in healthcare

Gold
Wednesday, June 5, 2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Share the love for this talk
Journeying toward AI-assisted documentation in healthcare
Speakers: Jennifer Kong
Link:

Summary

Documentation technology is the foundation of modern healthcare delivery. Convoluted, redundant, and excessive documentation is a pervasive problem that causes inefficiency in all aspects of the industry. At IncludedHealth, we are developing an AI-assisted documentation that summarizes and documents conversations between patients and their care providers. A care provider can push one button and have their entire patient encounter captured in a succinct and standardized format. Upon a pilot launch, the results were staggering. Within 6 months, we demonstrated a 64% reduction in time per encounter! However, despite our promising results, there still remain challenges specific to the demands of the healthcare domain. As our team continues to develop solutions to meet these challenges, we gain even more clarity on what it takes to design a human-backed, AI-powered healthcare system. Takeaways From this session, you can expect to learn the following:
  • Developing AI design in healthcare requires close collaboration between end users and your data science team
  • Piloting GenAI solutions may be more effective than traditional prototyping
  • Trading accuracy for efficiency is a barrier to adopting GenAI tools in healthcare
  • GenAI design in healthcare requires establishing critical boundaries as well as a good understanding of cognitive processing
  • Other factors to consider when designing AI solutions for service-based industries are understanding how training might be impacted, the importance of standardization vs. personalization of data output and the need for more autonomy and control elements due to consequences of unpredictable output errors

Key Insights

  • •

    Generative AI can reduce healthcare documentation time by over 60% but doesn't eliminate the need for manual editing and human review.

  • •

    Focusing AI tools initially on low-risk use cases like chat encounter summaries mitigates potential clinical harm.

  • •

    Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at summarizing text but struggle with capturing exact clinical details and non-verbal cues.

  • •

    Designing AI tools requires managing user expectations to prevent disappointment and frustration over imperfect outputs.

  • •

    A simple one-button UI with options to regenerate and manually edit notes improves user workflow efficiency and error recovery.

  • •

    Implicit metrics such as the 'edit rate'—the fraction of user edits on AI-generated text—help monitor AI output quality unobtrusively.

  • •

    Traditional prototyping methods are less effective for AI; incremental live pilots provide critical learning about AI's unpredictable outputs.

  • •

    Operational factors like quality assurance metrics impact user attitudes when AI-generated notes lower scores despite time savings.

  • •

    Human-centered collaboration between designers, data scientists, and users is essential to shape AI capabilities and discover unforeseen problems.

  • •

    AI models must remain static (non-learning) in healthcare to comply with regulations, creating challenges for ongoing improvements.

Notable Quotes

"We saw documentation time reduced by 64% after six months of using the AI tool."

"Documentation is important for liability and useful for patient handoffs, so notes must be concise yet detailed."

"Healthcare is not a silver bullet for AI; a lot of context comes from non-verbal cues where generative AI doesn’t apply."

"The unpredictable black box nature of LLMs means we had to zoom in on small problems first before seeing the bigger picture."

"We emphasized a simple one-button workflow with manual editing and regeneration to handle inevitable AI errors."

"The edit rate, our metric of human-added characters over total characters, tracks AI output quality without burdening users."

"Users were initially excited but six months later expressed frustration and uncertainty about the tool’s usefulness."

"We believe cognitive biases like frequency bias and expectation bias affected how users perceived AI errors over time."

"Our AI tool doesn’t learn from ongoing use due to regulatory constraints, which led to user frustration when performance didn’t improve."

"People are the plot twist in this journey — despite promising AI, only human connection reveals new problems and solutions."

Ask the Rosenbot
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Laura Weiss
There is No Playbook: Leader as Coach During Challenging Times
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Sam Proulx
Understanding Screen Readers on Mobile: How And Why to Learn from Native Users
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Catt Small
What's Next for ICs: Exploring Staff and Principal Designer Roles
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Yoel Sumitro
Actions and Reflections: Bridging the Skills Gap among Researchers
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Prerna Makanawala
Achieving Balanced Design Consistency
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Samuel Proulx
Designing beyond caricatures: Embracing real, diverse user needs
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Aiyana Bodi
Three Key Climate Initiatives and How You Can Help
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group
Sharon Banh
Reimagining research: What does the field need to grow? [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Amy Evans
How to Create Change
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Gretchen Anderson
Scaling the Human Center
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Sha Hwang
The First Fifty Years of Civic Design
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Sarah Brooks
Fireside chat with Sarah Brooks and Jen Pahlka
2021 • Civic Design Community
George Zhang
UX Research Excellence Framework
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
John Mortimer
Panel Discussion
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Nathan Curtis
Design Systems for Us: How Many One-Source(s)-of-Truth Are Enough?
2019 • DesignOps Community

More Videos

Marc Fonteijn

"Respondents who feel very connected are twice as likely to say they’re making a significant impact."

Marc Fonteijn Ru Butler

Increase your confidence, influence, and impact (through a Professional Community)

December 3, 2024

Dem Gerolemou

"Trust is something to build and maintain, not a box to check or a one-time achievement."

Dem Gerolemou Alexis Oh Neef Rehman

Climate technology fundamentals

May 15, 2024

Daniela Magaña Flores

"Home 24’s website is not cluttered and well-structured, explaining its higher appeal and inspiration scores."

Daniela Magaña Flores Ariane Rahn Jeff Ephraim Bander

Ahead of Competition: Learn What UX Benchmarking Can Do for Your Business Today

March 10, 2022

Abbey Smalley

"Design systems are not just components but guidelines, rules, and principles to create consistent experiences."

Abbey Smalley Sylas Souza

Scaling UX Past the Size of Your Team

January 8, 2024

Patrick Commarford

"The two variables that stood out were how many people the project impacts and how often they use it."

Patrick Commarford

Design Staffing for Impact

January 8, 2024

Xenia Adjoubei

"Engaging communities requires thinking beyond western-centric tools, considering language and cultural relevance for accessibility."

Xenia Adjoubei Sean Bruce

Empowering Communities Through the Researcher in Residence Program

March 29, 2023

Craig Villamor

"Doing nothing is not a neutral act. Ignorance may be bliss, but it doesn’t absolve you from responsibility."

Craig Villamor

Design Systems for Ethical Design

January 26, 2023

Jon Fukuda

"A designer working on a new component needs to understand not just that component but the templates using it and overall approach."

Jon Fukuda Ellie Krysl

Design Planning and Management Support

October 3, 2023

Iain McMaster

"More frequent, open communication and direct conversations helped us avoid assumptions and deliver something usable quickly."

Iain McMaster IHan Cheng

Design and Product: from Frenemy to Harmony

November 29, 2023