Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
How Will Design be Taught When the Schools Shut Down?
This video is featured in the Future of Design playlist.
Summary
Design schools are collapsing—literally. When institutions like California College of the Arts close after more than a century, it’s clear our old model of design education can’t survive economic pressure, tech disruption, or outdated ideas about what “training” should be. So what comes next? Nathan Shedroff, Thomas J. McLeish, and Hugh Dubberly will lead an exploration of what might replace the design school as we know it: apprenticeships, corporate academies, AI mentors, decentralized credentialing—and models no one’s tried (yet). It’s not just about how designers will learn, but who gets to define what education means in the future.
Key Insights
-
•
Design and higher education face severe economic and enrollment crises exacerbated by demographic shifts and political pressures, threatening many independent colleges.
-
•
Traditional admission processes may be replaced by universal acceptance combined with personalized learning journeys guided by free and validated educational content.
-
•
AI is not only a disruptive tool but a new medium and material for creative design practice and education requiring novel pedagogical approaches.
-
•
Critical thinking combined with critical making underpins design education, but both theorizing and making can serve as entry points in a recursive learning loop.
-
•
Changing communication technologies have historically reshaped knowledge transmission, and AI may fundamentally transform how collective knowledge is built and shared.
-
•
Measurement and assessment in design education are challenging due to multiple valid answers and the subjective nature of critique, risking oversimplified scoring metrics.
-
•
Blending apprenticeship/internship models with classroom co-learning may better prepare students for real-world design practice than traditional academic structures.
-
•
Lifelong learning should be central to education, enabling returning alumni to teach and share knowledge continuously, not just one-off credentialing.
-
•
Play and experimentation are essential in engaging learners with AI and complex systems, helping avoid black-box dependence and promoting creativity.
-
•
Design education lags industry needs partly due to conservative academic culture and governance often by non-designers, necessitating stronger integration and innovation.
Notable Quotes
"What if everyone was accepted? We could rise almost anyone to proficiency if the curriculum and pedagogy are strong enough."
"I believe that 50% of white-collar jobs are just going away in the next 5 to 10 years."
"The current wave of AI has disrupted practice so much, so quickly, that it's difficult to tell what practice is or what it will be in three years."
"Critical making requires critique, theory, activity, reflection, leading back to theory, but it doesn't have to start with theory. It can start anywhere."
"Reading books and articles is no longer central for many young people. What will replace books and articles for collective knowledge building?"
"We need to figure out how to assess design projects and designers better because employers need to make choices, but design resists simple scoring."
"What if learning was always mobile, decentralized, distributed among people and institutions, with new ways to acknowledge learning beyond grades?"
"Kids love to play. They challenge the world through games and simulation, so the things we create need to support play and experimentation."
"Universities are fairly recent inventions; knowledge transfer happened for thousands of years by learning in communities before formal institutions."
"Design schools are often governed by non-designers and are surprisingly conservative, slow to change, and sometimes exploit precarious gig workers."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Lack of research before or after the workshop can be recovered from but at some cost to the concept’s validity."
Anne MamaghaniHow Your Organization's Generative Workshops Are Probably Going Wrong and How to Get Them Right
March 28, 2023
"The real breakthrough was when the pilgrim’s mechanical bird spoke both ways, braiding their words together to reach the summit."
Kurt McCullochFaster alone, further together: Rebuilding collaboration in the age of AI research
March 10, 2026
"Children are advanced in design topics like UX because they see them in their everyday apps and games."
Sofía Delsordo Kassim VeraPublic Policy for Jalisco's Designers to Make Design Matter
December 8, 2021
"This is a topic near and dear to my heart and I feel really long overdue conversation."
Christian CrumlishIntroduction by our Conference Chair
December 6, 2022
"We created AI OKRs allowing our team members to experiment and then share their findings with the team."
Ebru NamaldiDesigning the Designer’s Journey: Scaling Teams, Culture, and Growth Through DesignOps
September 11, 2025
"Critiques maintain focus on the quality of our outcomes and sweat every pixel we put in the hands of our users."
Joseph MeersmanSweating the Pixel: Scaling Quality through Critique
June 10, 2021
"We didn’t want to develop yet another model but rather a customizable approach to support diverse clients with innovation portfolio management."
Milan Guenther Benjamin KumpfThe $212 billion ‘so what?’: unlocking impact in development cooperation
November 20, 2025
"Research democratization rarely frees up strategic research time; it often increases facilitation and ops work."
Kathleen AsjesResearch Democratization: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
March 10, 2022
"Typing prompts is not the UX of the future. Integration into the interactive context where you work is better."
Josh Clark Veronika KindredSentient Design, AI, and the Radically Adaptive Experience (1st of 3 seminars)
January 15, 2025