Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Puzzled? How to Coordinate Humans for Complex Challenges
Summary
How do we coordinate people for complex challenges? Certainly not with traditional work structures, designed to optimize for performance. Rather, we need new ways of working—new structures—that have been specifically designed to coordinate people for understanding. We'll look at a framework that can be used by teams, organizations, and other groups of humans working on complex problems. Stephen P. Anderson is a speaker and author who spends too much thinking about visual collaboration, how people learn, and board games; not necessarily in that order. Oh, and he’s on a mission: To make learning the hard stuff fun, by creating ‘things to think with’ and ‘spaces’ for generative play. This mission has led Stephen to MURAL, where he facilitates design strategy and innovation. Stephen's newest book, Figure It Out: Getting From Information to Understanding, has been described as both “required reading for designers and anyone else who needs to explain things” and a book that will “change the way you see the world.”
Key Insights
-
•
Complex problems differ fundamentally from complicated problems by involving unknown variables, shifting participants, and unclear success criteria.
-
•
Traditional top-down management structures often fail to coordinate people effectively on complex challenges.
-
•
Just enough structure—no more—is vital to prevent both chaos and rigid control when coordinating teams.
-
•
Cultivating shared language and standards is crucial; vague or specialized language can hinder true agreement and alignment.
-
•
Invisible environments like shared vision, mission, and values shape team coordination but must be actively lived, not just documented.
-
•
Designing visible environments—physical or virtual spaces—can shape group behavior and collaboration outcomes.
-
•
Psychological safety is foundational for teams to learn fast and innovate, emerging from deep listening, empathy, and interpersonal trust.
-
•
Accumulating multiple perspectives through drawing, analogies, and frameworks enriches understanding of complex challenges.
-
•
Adult development models explain why groups may act less mature than individuals, especially during frequent organizational resets.
-
•
Metaphors like gardening help in framing culture cultivation, emphasizing ongoing care, attention, and shared responsibility.
Notable Quotes
"All these traditional ways managers tell employees what to do probably don’t apply in complex problem contexts."
"We need just enough structure and no more to avoid chaos or stifling control."
"Until we clarify our language, we’ll agree on everything but not truly agree."
"Specialists would rather share their toothbrush than their language."
"The smartest person in the room is the room itself."
"Psychological safety isn’t created by an initiative but through a thousand tiny habits in language and behavior."
"If you want psychological safety, you have to start with self-awareness and deep listening."
"Teams often reset every 18 months and regress to infancy in trust and decision-making."
"A gardening metaphor fits culture better than cold, invisible icebergs because it highlights nurturing and growth."
"Drawing pictures together helps reduce interpretation and share perspectives effectively."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"In jazz, the structure is head, I solo, you solo, then back to head—repeated often and universally."
Jim KalbachJazz Improvisation as a Model for Team Collaboration
November 6, 2017
"Evergreen content needs a strong perspective on why the topic matters along with practical examples on how to apply it."
Louis RosenfeldCoffee with Lou: Should You Write a (UX) Book?
March 7, 2024
"Levels can mean really different things at different companies, so ask a lot of questions about expectations for each level."
Catt Small Micah Bennett Brian Carr Jessica HarlleeWhat's Next for ICs: Exploring Staff and Principal Designer Roles
February 22, 2024
"Sharing your research skills broadly within your company can create unexpected opportunities to improve experiences."
Marieke McCloskeyUser Science: Product Analytics & User Research
March 11, 2021
"DeepFakes can look too realistic and might introduce new privacy risks if donor faces come from real people."
Llewyn Paine[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings
June 5, 2024
"Qualitative reasoning about causal mechanisms usually comes from lived experience, either the researcher or participants."
Joshua NobleCasual Inference
October 6, 2023
"Stakeholders are users too; the product we’re sharing is the research and learnings for their decision-making."
Sara LogelYour Colleagues are Your Users Too
March 29, 2023
"This is the same conference in so many good ways — good ways are that it’s resilient and there’s a certain steadiness."
Bria Alexander Louis RosenfeldWelcome
January 8, 2024
"Consistency is so important that sometimes even consistency in failure works if it means I only have to learn the workaround once."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
June 7, 2023
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What strategies motivate cross-functional teams to input their research findings into a centralized repository?
How does systems thinking help identify leverage points for improving rural maternal health?
What role should AI play in user research tools, and how do you manage associated risks and accountability?