Theme Two Intro
Summary
The speaker acknowledges the difficulties researchers face during waves of layoffs, including personal experience with job loss, and argues that this is precisely the moment to advance research by becoming more valuable and influential within organizations. The central theme is urging researchers to evolve from merely informing decisions to actively leading change. The talk previews a series of presentations by notable figures such as Priyinal and Rita Khadri on human-centered AI innovation through qualitative and participatory research; Sarah Fatala who challenges binary views on participatory research; Scott Please on blending qualitative and quantitative approaches via mathematical models to foster organizational insight diffusion; Mamagani on preventing political theater in generative workshops; Carl Turner on frameworks to counteract organizational dysfunction; Kristen Guth on stakeholder alignment workshops; and Mike Oren on transforming research approaches akin to pharmaceutical industry models. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the strategic position of researchers at the intersection of insight and action and calls for a reinvention of research practice to meet evolving organizational needs. The talk encourages attendees to embrace change, amplify their impact, and lead transformation within their professional contexts.
Key Insights
-
•
Layoffs in research have been recurring events, challenging continuity but also serving as catalysts for change.
-
•
Researchers must transition from informing decisions to becoming proactive organizational change makers.
-
•
Participatory research is often viewed as a binary choice, but Sarah Fatala offers a nuanced framework to expand this perspective.
-
•
Integrating qualitative and quantitative research through mathematical conceptual models can enhance insight diffusion, as Scott Please advocates.
-
•
Generative workshops like design sprints risk devolving into political theater without proper facilitation, as highlighted by Mamagani.
-
•
Frameworks for diagnosing and reviving troubled projects can address underlying organizational and cultural challenges, according to Carl Turner.
-
•
Workshops to drive clarity and align stakeholders are powerful tools for organizational change, exemplified by Kristen Guth's approach.
-
•
There is value in adopting research models from other industries, such as pharmaceuticals, for advancing research practices, per Mike Oren.
-
•
Researchers hold a unique position at the nexus of insight and action, allowing them to lead change effectively.
-
•
Moving beyond traditional research methods is essential for increasing the strategic value of research in organizations.
Notable Quotes
"This is a weird time for research. Layoffs have torn through our field."
"There's no better time to advance research than now."
"We don't just need to do a better job of articulating our value; we need to become more valuable."
"Researchers as organizational change makers is the theme for today."
"Participatory research always seems like something you're either doing or not doing — more often than not, not doing."
"What got us here won't get us where we want to go."
"We researchers have an opportunity to use our position, our orientation, and our skills to lead change."
"We're positioned at the nexus of insight and action."
"When it's done, I invite you to take the lessons learned and provocations shared back into your professional lives."
"Let's shake s*** up."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If a dialog pops up but the keyboard focus isn’t moved into it, a screen reader user might not know it’s there."
Sam ProulxEverything You Ever Wanted to Know About Screen Readers
June 11, 2021
"If you are a cohort participant and don’t see your private Slack channel, please let us know so we can guide you."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
November 17, 2022
"If you were blindsided recently, I’ve been there. I just really appreciated a kind voice because I didn’t hear a single word they said."
Corey Nelson Amy SanteeLayoffs
November 15, 2022
"The problem with the bike rental app wasn’t UX design; it was the enterprise’s inability to distribute bikes to meet user demand."
Milan GuentherA Shared Language for Co-Creating Ambitious Endeavours
June 6, 2023
"People will talk to customers whether you want them to or not. The question is how to make it a better experience."
Erin May Roberta Dombrowski Laura Oxenfeld Brooke HintonDistributed, Democratized, Decentralized: Finding a Research Model to Support Your Org
March 10, 2022
"The most important thing you can do is listen and watch and put assumptions aside about what is easy or hard."
Sam ProulxUnderstanding Screen Readers on Mobile: How And Why to Learn from Native Users
June 6, 2023
"When clients join us in the field and experience research deeply, they often become advocates who come back for more."
Mujtaba HameedThe new horizon of ethnography: using AI to unlock the full potential of in-person research
March 11, 2026
"Regulation is part of the solution, but by diversifying who makes technology and embedding safeguards, we can better prevent corruption of well-intentioned products."
Ilana LipsettAnticipating Risk, Regulating Tech: A Playbook for Ethical Technology Governance
December 10, 2021
"If we think about training AI on the average, then what we will get is more of the same."
Samuel ProulxFrom Standards to Innovation: Why Inclusive Design Wins
September 10, 2025
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What are the benefits of linking AI-powered research repositories with tools like Slack for organizational adoption?
How do you distinguish real regulatory constraints from organizational assumptions in healthcare UX?
In what ways are synthetic users or virtual personas currently used in research practice?