A Consistent Culture of Design
Summary
Phil Gilbert outlines IBM's ambitious design transformation over two and a half years, aiming to embed a culture of design across 380,000 employees. He introduces the 'culture quotient' framework, emphasizing artifacts created by behaviors, the degree to which the culture embraces them, and duration of that embrace. IBM’s approach includes hiring over 450 formally trained designers, building relationships with top design schools like SCAD and RISD, and surrounding junior hires with experienced design leads such as Doug Powell and Denise Burton. Gilbert highlights the creation of rigorous intern programs led by Devon O’Brien from SCAD and the development of IBM Design Thinking as a lightweight, collaborative practice empowering multidisciplinary teams including product managers and engineers. Instead of a top-down mandate, IBM adopted an opt-in approach, accelerating early success and sustainable adoption. They also introduced a design language that balances consistency with implementation freedom, and purpose-built flexible design studios like the Austin location, encouraging movement and collaboration. Global studios in Germany, England, China, and other locations form a network unified by digital tools and collaboration platforms. Gilbert closes with cultural notes on change as a constant, unity without uniformity, and the importance of empowerment, collaboration, and the willingness to fail gracefully, validated by devotion from leadership including CEO Ginni Rometty.
Key Insights
-
•
Design culture can be understood and shaped using a culture quotient formula: artifacts created × level of cultural embrace × duration of embrace.
-
•
IBM set an ambitious goal to hire 1,000 formally trained designers within five years, hiring over 450 in two and a half years.
-
•
IBM emphasizes 'people plus practices plus places = artifacts' to generate meaningful design outcomes.
-
•
IBM Design Thinking is a lightweight practice focusing on collaboration around artifacts, not rigid processes.
-
•
An opt-in approach to embedding design thinking helped IBM accelerate early wins, avoiding top-down enforcement.
-
•
IBM built deep relationships with top design universities to recruit diverse new talent directly from schools such as SCAD, RISD, and Stanford D-School.
-
•
IBM created formal career paths for designers parallel to engineering, including Distinguished Designer and Design Principal levels.
-
•
IBM’s design language focuses on giving broad guidance instead of rigid pattern libraries, encouraging implementation freedom and evolution.
-
•
The Austin design studio was purpose-built with movable walls and spaces to foster dynamic, radical collaboration and creativity.
-
•
The program’s success depends on empowering not only designers but all IBM employees to become design thinkers who opt into the culture.
Notable Quotes
"We could create a sustainable culture of design and use it as our leading edge weapon of transformation."
"Culture isn’t just behavior over time, it’s the artifacts that culture creates and embraces over time."
"People plus practices plus places equals artifacts."
"IBM Design Thinking is about collaborating around artifacts and frameworks, not prescribing the process teams must follow."
"We decided to make it an opt-in program and that accelerated early wins and self-selected positive outcomes."
"Design thinking is the scientific method for the 21st century."
"We had an engineering culture that confused uniformity with design, and consistency with design."
"Our design language gives broad ditches on either side of the road with some nuance, but no rigid libraries at first."
"The Austin studio’s walls can be put up and taken down by a 90-pound person on a Home Depot shopping cart."
"We’re showing people how to collaborate like crazy and how to fail gracefully."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Assistive technology has to communicate with the destination, that’s your website or product."
Sheri Byrne-HaberAccessibility at Scale
June 9, 2021
"When UX researchers and product managers collaborate, the product speaks to users’ hearts."
Prayag Narula Hannah HudsonEmpowering Designers to do Good Research
March 11, 2022
"The UX team is never the keeper of all knowledge of the customer; the whole company owns the experience."
Janelle EstesUX Research Trends
January 28, 2021
"Finding a leadership champion and building on small wins creates momentum for integrating research and content."
Craig Brookes Andreas Huebner Morgan Quinn"Just Make it Look Good" and Other Ways We're Misunderstood
June 11, 2021
"We design a community that would be missed if it were gone for our service design leaders."
Marc Fonteijn Ru ButlerIncrease your confidence, influence, and impact (through a Professional Community)
December 3, 2024
"You cannot provide end-to-end service for every researcher, but you can deliver highly supported self-service — Kate Towsey."
Kate TowseyThe State of ResearchOps: More Than Just Theory
June 20, 2019
"If I make a mistake on our team, it’s not gonna be held against me; my team won’t disconnect from me."
Alla WeinbergDesign Teams Need Psychological Safety: Here’s How to Create It
September 9, 2022
"A government designer aims to reduce UX variation while a contractor may optimize only their single product, creating potential conflicts."
Shawna Hein Kevin HoffmanCreate a Cohesive Civic Design Practice Across Agency, Vendors, and Contracts
November 17, 2022
"Designing for marginalized communities often shows how to build scalable solutions with limited resources, saving money."
Tricia WangSCALE: Discussion
June 15, 2018
