Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

A Typology of Participation in Participatory Research

Gold
Tuesday, March 28, 2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Share the love for this talk
A Typology of Participation in Participatory Research
Speakers: Sarah Fathallah
Link:

Summary

This talk aims to unpack the notion of participation used in participatory design research, by proposing a framework through which different levels of participation can occur at different stages of the research process. Drawing examples of work in child welfare and foster care, this framework is ultimately an invitation to challenge the notion that participation is binary (i.e., either research is participatory or isn't) or fixed (i.e., there is only one way participation can be done). Instead, participation is a negotiation that should take into account different factors (e.g., partners, resources, timeline), and could include a combination of different levels at different stages in any given research study.

Key Insights

  • Participation in research should be viewed as a continuum across different stages and degrees, not a binary or single ladder.

  • Arnstein's ladder of participation, while influential, oversimplifies participation by focusing mainly on power transfer and neglecting safety, well-being, and other goals.

  • The spiral model of participatory action research adds a temporal dimension emphasizing ongoing reflection and participant feedback throughout the project.

  • Meaningful participation requires more than just involving people; it demands trauma-responsiveness, safety, mutuality, compensation, and avoiding tokenism.

  • Mapping degrees and sites of participation creates diverse assemblies unique to each research project, highlighting complexity and flexibility.

  • Involving people with lived experience as research team members enhances study design, recruitment, data interpretation, and dissemination.

  • External academic peer review can exert power that conflicts with participatory research goals, so forming a lived expert review board can rebalance power.

  • Metrics quantifying the quantity of participation (e.g., number of sessions or participants) risk misrepresenting the quality and ethics of engagement.

  • Longitudinal research with foster youth faces ethical and practical challenges, especially around consent and developmental readiness, often limiting study scope.

  • Participation should be considered an ethical commitment, but it must be complemented by care ethics and trauma-informed practices to avoid harm.

Notable Quotes

"Youth, families, and communities impacted by the child welfare system experience a lot of loss of control, with important aspects of their lives decided without their input."

"Participation is one way to minimize loss of control and allow people to exercise their agency and autonomy."

"Arnstein’s ladder reduces participation to delegating decision-making power, ignoring goals like safety, well-being, and satisfaction."

"The spiral model introduces temporality—constantly going back to participants to confirm outcomes align with goals."

"Instead of asking if research is participatory or not, we should ask when and how participatory the research is."

"Participatory research doesn’t inherently prevent harm or power differentials; it just engages more people in the process."

"Just because you do more sessions or add review moments doesn’t mean the quality of engagement improves."

"We formed a lived expert review board to support framing conclusions and decisions, rebalancing power from academic peer reviewers."

"Many ethical and practical issues prevent us from conducting longitudinal research with children under 18 in foster care."

"Participation is an ethical commitment but should be complemented by an ethic of care, valuing people’s time and being trauma responsive."

Ask the Rosenbot
Chris Hammond
Embedding sustainability into enterprise design and development: A journey towards "sustainability consciousness"
2025 • Climate UX Interest Group
Lada Gorlenko
Theme 1: Intro
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Jason Mesut
Unmasking Design Leadership: Navigating leadership without neglecting ourselves
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Sam Proulx
Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Screen Readers
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Robin Beers
Panel: Excellence in Communicating Insights
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Ned Dwyer
The Future of DesignOps is Tool Consolidation
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Robin Beers
Navigating organizational systems: Rethinking researcher’s role in driving change
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Yolanda Rankin
Black Feminist Epistemology as a Critical Framework for Equitable Design
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Angelos Arnis
Navigating the Rapid Shifts in Tech's Turbulent Terrain
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Clemens Janssen
Efficiently Scaling Research as a Team of One
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Dean Broadley
Not Black Enough to be White
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Megan Campos
What Did I Miss? The Hidden Costs of Deprioritizing Diversity in User Research
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Yoel Sumitro
Actions and Reflections: Bridging the Skills Gap among Researchers
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Mackenzie Guinon
M.C. Escher’s UX Research Career Ladder
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Llewyn Paine
Coexisting with AI: A practical guide for researchers to navigate tools, ethics, and integration
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Sofia Quintero
Beyond Tools: The Messy Business of Implementing Research Repositories
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold

More Videos

Jim Kalbach

"Having big ears means listening more to others than to yourself during a performance."

Jim Kalbach

Jazz Improvisation as a Model for Team Collaboration

November 6, 2017

Louis Rosenfeld

"Writing a book is awful in terms of time, sweat, and time away from your loved ones, but it’s an amazing gift to dig deep into something you care about."

Louis Rosenfeld

Coffee with Lou: Should You Write a (UX) Book?

March 7, 2024

Catt Small

"Building influence has been such a challenging part of growing in my own career. It takes a lot of communication and understanding others’ goals."

Catt Small Micah Bennett Brian Carr Jessica Harllee

What's Next for ICs: Exploring Staff and Principal Designer Roles

February 22, 2024

Marieke McCloskey

"Less than a third of respondents feel like they work somewhere with a clear investment in customer-driven decision making."

Marieke McCloskey

User Science: Product Analytics & User Research

March 11, 2021

Llewyn Paine

"Processing limits and licensing terms currently restrict how much video and audio these AI tools can handle."

Llewyn Paine

[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings

June 5, 2024

Joshua Noble

"Synthetic controls create counterfactuals using historical data when no suitable control group exists."

Joshua Noble

Casual Inference

October 6, 2023

Sara Logel

"Storytelling helps gain people’s attention, build empathy, and improve understanding and recall of key points."

Sara Logel

Your Colleagues are Your Users Too

March 29, 2023

Bria Alexander

"There will be session notes and sketch notes so you don’t have to take notes yourself unless you want to."

Bria Alexander Louis Rosenfeld

Welcome

January 8, 2024

Sam Proulx

"I’ve nearly bought products in my sleep because I memorized the key presses from consistent checkout flows."

Sam Proulx

Online Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience

June 7, 2023