Rosenverse
The Politics of Radical Research: A Manifesto

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

The Politics of Radical Research: A Manifesto

Gold
Monday, March 27, 2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Share the love for this talk
The Politics of Radical Research: A Manifesto
Speakers: Sahibzada Mayed
Link:

Summary

This session is intended to be messy and will leave you with more questions than you came in with. We shall start off by asking ourselves “what are you pretending not to know?” This question inspired by African-American scholar and activist Toni Cade Bambara will guide us into the conversation. How do we understand our role as researchers? In what ways are we complicit in reproducing structural inequities and systemic harm? This manifesto is centered around 3 “big” themes:
  • At what and whose cost do we engage in research?
  • What right do I have to engage in this research work?
  • What if I refused to participate?
This is an invitation to get intimate with ourselves and investigate the privilege(s) we hold as researchers and designers. Reflecting on the power imbalances that exist, how can we move toward a culturally thriving and sustainably empowering approach to emancipatory research that centers minoritized communities? Asking these questions and sitting with their complexities is urgent and necessary. Together, we strive for less extractive, decolonial, and anti-capitalist visions for research that are rooted in liberatory harm reduction, relationship building and community empowerment.

Key Insights

  • •

    Researchers benefit from and simultaneously reproduce harmful systems, requiring deep self-awareness and accountability.

  • •

    Empathy should be the baseline foundation of research, not the ultimate goal, because it cannot fully capture lived experience.

  • •

    Centering marginalized people’s lived experiences must avoid appropriating or ‘stealing’ their stories.

  • •

    Monetary compensation alone is insufficient; research should embody reciprocity, care, and generous ethical compensation.

  • •

    Time is a weaponized, commodified social construct that contributes to extractive research practices for both researchers and participants.

  • •

    Research is often treated like a mining operation, but humans must not be commodified as mining resources.

  • •

    Researchers must differentiate between their right to engage versus feelings of entitlement and constantly reflect on access and privilege.

  • •

    Trauma should not be treated as a prerequisite or ‘rite of passage’ for research participation, nor a justification for tokenism.

  • •

    Researcher agency includes the power to choose to refuse participation or alter modes of engagement ethically.

  • •

    Harm is inevitable in complex systems; acknowledging caused harm and repairing relationships is a critical ethical responsibility.

Notable Quotes

"The true focus of revolutionary change is never merely the oppressive situation but rather that piece of the oppressor that lives in all of us."

"Empathy is really just the floor, not the ceiling; it cannot replace someone's actual lived experience."

"If you walk in someone else’s shoes, then you’ve taken their shoes."

"Please do not engage in mining; research is not a mining operation."

"What role does time play as a form of currency in contributing to extractive methods of research?"

"We must distinguish between right and entitlement when engaging in research and acknowledge the responsibility that accompanies privilege."

"Does communal proximity guarantee the right to engage in research? This is a complicated question without easy answers."

"Trauma should not be reduced to a right of passage that justifies participation in research."

"Choosing to remain silent is still a choice; agency means owning how and if you participate."

"Are you able to say I caused harm, and can you repair the relationships and impacts your work has created?"

Ask the Rosenbot
Daniela Magaña Flores
Ahead of Competition: Learn What UX Benchmarking Can Do for Your Business Today
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
John Devanney
The Design Management Office
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold
Saara Kamppari-Miller
"Prototype" vs "Prototype"--Breaking Down and Rebuilding Our Understanding of What We Do
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Jules Monza
Use These Words and Count These Things
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Sam Ladner
Data Exhaust and Personal Data: Learning from Consumer Products to Enhance Enterprise UX
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Dorelle Rabinowitz
The Magic Word is Trust
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Louis Rosenfeld
Becoming a Civic Designer: Making the Move from Private to Public Sector
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Dean Broadley
Not Black Enough to be White
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Kara Kane
Theme One Intro
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Mariah Hay
BUILD: Discussion
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Reginé Gilbert
Asking the Right Questions: Life, Hope and Moving Forward During the Pandemic
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Matt Bernius
Trauma-informed Research: A Panel Discussion
2021 • Advancing Research Community
Alison Rand
Scaling Impact with Service Design
2021 • DesignOps Community
Nathan Curtis
Discussion
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Molly Fargotstein
Multipurpose Communication & UX Research Marketing
2019 • DesignOps Community
Theresa Neil
Designing for Wellness: Specializing in Healthcare
2024 • Rosenfeld Community

More Videos

Mark Interrante

"AI can accelerate prioritization tasks, but the final judgment must come from humans who understand context."

Mark Interrante Harry Max

AI for Prioritization (3rd of 3 seminars)

July 11, 2024

Patrizia Bertini

"Next year we need to have an accessibility budget. You do what you want, but that's the choice."

Patrizia Bertini

The (r)evolution of designOps: It’s Time to Think (really) BIG

September 11, 2025

Shan Shen

"Sometimes you have to insist on the correct terms that are widely recognized and consistently used."

Shan Shen

Translating UX Terms into Business Contexts

November 29, 2023

Adam Thomas

"Being data informed is not data driven—blindly following data can kill you, like the Challenger explosion."

Adam Thomas

Survival Metrics – Making Change in a Fast, Data-Informed, and Politically Safe Way

December 6, 2022

Robin Beers

"Turning the research lens on both the ‘in here’ organization and the ‘out there’ customer reality helps reveal misalignments and opportunities."

Robin Beers

Research as a Catalyst for Organizational Transformation

March 12, 2021

Sheri Byrne-Haber

"Accessibility defects are bugs. If it’s a P1 blocking bug for an accessibility issue, treat it like any other P1 bug."

Sheri Byrne-Haber

Accessibility at Scale

June 9, 2021

Joseph Meersman

"Design shares are more about presenting finished work and practice defending it, not about peer-to-peer feedback."

Joseph Meersman

Sweating the Pixel: Scaling Quality through Critique

June 10, 2021

Deanna Washington

"I’m still early on in measuring accessibility impact but tying early bug fixes to ROI is promising."

Deanna Washington Bria Alexander Jon Fukuda Saara Kamppari-Miller Farid Sabitov

Connecting the Ops: Plenary Panel and Closing Circle

September 9, 2022

Aaron Stienstra

"Reflecting on our power as implementers of policy, we must reciprocate by giving back information and value to those we engage."

Aaron Stienstra Lashanda Hodge

Leveraging Civic Design to Advance Equity and Rebuild Trust in the US Federal Government

December 8, 2021