The Politics of Radical Research: A Manifesto
Summary
- At what and whose cost do we engage in research?
- What right do I have to engage in this research work?
- What if I refused to participate?
Key Insights
-
•
Researchers benefit from and simultaneously reproduce harmful systems, requiring deep self-awareness and accountability.
-
•
Empathy should be the baseline foundation of research, not the ultimate goal, because it cannot fully capture lived experience.
-
•
Centering marginalized people’s lived experiences must avoid appropriating or ‘stealing’ their stories.
-
•
Monetary compensation alone is insufficient; research should embody reciprocity, care, and generous ethical compensation.
-
•
Time is a weaponized, commodified social construct that contributes to extractive research practices for both researchers and participants.
-
•
Research is often treated like a mining operation, but humans must not be commodified as mining resources.
-
•
Researchers must differentiate between their right to engage versus feelings of entitlement and constantly reflect on access and privilege.
-
•
Trauma should not be treated as a prerequisite or ‘rite of passage’ for research participation, nor a justification for tokenism.
-
•
Researcher agency includes the power to choose to refuse participation or alter modes of engagement ethically.
-
•
Harm is inevitable in complex systems; acknowledging caused harm and repairing relationships is a critical ethical responsibility.
Notable Quotes
"The true focus of revolutionary change is never merely the oppressive situation but rather that piece of the oppressor that lives in all of us."
"Empathy is really just the floor, not the ceiling; it cannot replace someone's actual lived experience."
"If you walk in someone else’s shoes, then you’ve taken their shoes."
"Please do not engage in mining; research is not a mining operation."
"What role does time play as a form of currency in contributing to extractive methods of research?"
"We must distinguish between right and entitlement when engaging in research and acknowledge the responsibility that accompanies privilege."
"Does communal proximity guarantee the right to engage in research? This is a complicated question without easy answers."
"Trauma should not be reduced to a right of passage that justifies participation in research."
"Choosing to remain silent is still a choice; agency means owning how and if you participate."
"Are you able to say I caused harm, and can you repair the relationships and impacts your work has created?"
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"AI can accelerate prioritization tasks, but the final judgment must come from humans who understand context."
Mark Interrante Harry MaxAI for Prioritization (3rd of 3 seminars)
July 11, 2024
"Next year we need to have an accessibility budget. You do what you want, but that's the choice."
Patrizia BertiniThe (r)evolution of designOps: It’s Time to Think (really) BIG
September 11, 2025
"Sometimes you have to insist on the correct terms that are widely recognized and consistently used."
Shan ShenTranslating UX Terms into Business Contexts
November 29, 2023
"Being data informed is not data driven—blindly following data can kill you, like the Challenger explosion."
Adam ThomasSurvival Metrics – Making Change in a Fast, Data-Informed, and Politically Safe Way
December 6, 2022
"Turning the research lens on both the ‘in here’ organization and the ‘out there’ customer reality helps reveal misalignments and opportunities."
Robin BeersResearch as a Catalyst for Organizational Transformation
March 12, 2021
"Accessibility defects are bugs. If it’s a P1 blocking bug for an accessibility issue, treat it like any other P1 bug."
Sheri Byrne-HaberAccessibility at Scale
June 9, 2021
"Design shares are more about presenting finished work and practice defending it, not about peer-to-peer feedback."
Joseph MeersmanSweating the Pixel: Scaling Quality through Critique
June 10, 2021
"I’m still early on in measuring accessibility impact but tying early bug fixes to ROI is promising."
Deanna Washington Bria Alexander Jon Fukuda Saara Kamppari-Miller Farid SabitovConnecting the Ops: Plenary Panel and Closing Circle
September 9, 2022
"Reflecting on our power as implementers of policy, we must reciprocate by giving back information and value to those we engage."
Aaron Stienstra Lashanda HodgeLeveraging Civic Design to Advance Equity and Rebuild Trust in the US Federal Government
December 8, 2021
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How can research teams balance the tradeoff between research pacing, speed, and quality?
How have changes in communication technologies historically affected collective knowledge building, and what might AI's role be?
What recent standards are improving interoperability between legacy EHR systems and startups?