Investigating qualitative depth of AI-moderated interviews
Summary
Faced with the need to understand our customers’ decision-making (those who purchased our platform, and those who didn’t), I initially relied on surveys. However, I found they lacked the nuance that real conversations reveal. By introducing AI moderation, I created a way for participants to engage in adaptive, conversational interviews that went beyond the limits of static forms.
I’ll walk through how I set up these sessions, what prompts worked (and didn’t), and how I analyzed the results. I’ll also share how I’ve used other AI tools like ChatGPT and Perplexity to assist with synthesis and bias-checking, creating a workflow that both expands my analytical reach and strengthens the rigor of my findings.
As AI tools continue to enter the researcher’s toolkit, this case study illustrates how we can thoughtfully integrate them to expand—not erode—the human depth of qualitative work. It offers a model for how lean teams can maintain research quality while navigating the realities of limited time, budget, and capacity.
This talk will explore the emerging space between automation and augmentation, finding opportunity for depth when time and resources are tight.”
Key Insights
-
•
AI moderation enables more qualitative depth than surveys due to participants speaking freely rather than typing.
-
•
AI moderation platforms require detailed and explicit research plans to guide effective questioning.
-
•
AI moderation often struggles with natural conversational flow and can produce awkward pauses or interruptions.
-
•
Follow-up questions from AI moderators can be vague, repetitive, or miss opportunities to dive deeper.
-
•
AI moderation is best suited for validation or deepening understanding of known problem spaces, not foundational discovery.
-
•
Participants may prefer AI moderation over surveys due to ease and flexibility, supporting higher and quicker recruitment.
-
•
AI moderation platforms currently do not replace human analysis or provide strong quantitative outputs.
-
•
High emotion or sensitive topics may work better with AI moderation if participants prefer anonymity, but human interviews excel at rapport.
-
•
Researchers need to invest time troubleshooting and iterating prompts in AI moderated studies.
-
•
AI moderated studies allow teams of one to scale qualitative research when live interviews are infeasible.
Notable Quotes
"Having one-on-calls with people is one of my favorite parts of conducting research, and it felt like this was being taken away from me just for the sake of saving business resources."
"AI moderation, in short, is a large language model that runs a moderated interview session without a human researcher present."
"I was interested in thinking of this method as a survey plus that you can use to get survey-like data but with more qualitative depth."
"When I gave the model my list of interview questions, it actually made for a really bizarre participant experience because the model just went down the line of the different questions."
"People were more likely to explain their thought process and just more context around the particular situation of their org."
"There were moments like long kind of awkward pauses where the model was processing, and sometimes it actually spoke over participants."
"Follow-up questions missed opportunities to probe deeper or were confusing, and participants had to repeat themselves."
"If I really just needed only quantitative data from a survey, then I would not go the AI moderated route."
"AI moderation did not make the research easier. It made it possible under real world constraints."
"From setup to analysis, AI moderation still requires a good understanding of what quality research looks like and how to interpret qualitative data."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"94% of companies exclude disability from their diversity and inclusion initiatives, a major missed opportunity to advance accessibility."
Sheri Byrne-HaberThe Importance of Accessible Design Systems
January 8, 2024
"Hands-on activities like practicing user interviews and design sprint sketches gave people courage to try UX tactics in the real world."
Abbey Smalley Sylas SouzaScaling UX Past the Size of Your Team
January 8, 2024
"You can be most successful at using new note-taking tools if you bring to the practice a different set of mental models."
Jorge ArangoExploding the Notebook: How to Unlock the Power of Linked Notes (2nd of 3 seminars)
April 19, 2024
"Our CMO incorporated our experience principles into the brand strategy, which was a huge and unexpected boost."
Sarah WilliamsA Framework for CX Transformation
June 11, 2021
"Avoid leading questions and adjectives so participants use their own words and reveal true values and feelings about money."
Yasmine KhanChecking Bias and Listening to Financially Vulnerable Americans
March 30, 2020
"Resiliency is not necessarily how we react to challenges, but how we move beyond them."
Dave MaloufTheme 3: Introduction and Provocation
January 8, 2024
"Key results must be measures of human behavior and outcomes, not output metrics like 'launch this service'."
Jeff GothelfWho does what by how much?
November 20, 2025
"The key to combating survey fatigue is short surveys triggered at the right context, making respondents feel listened to and valued."
Aleksandra Korczynska Caroline Jarrett Justyna ParmeeSurvey Tools
March 12, 2026
"We want to hear our partners speaking design language and advocating for design activities across the organization."
Frank DuranPartnership Playbook: Lessons Learned in Effective Partnership
January 8, 2024
