Research is a team sport: advancing the work when everyone does the research
Summary
As UX roles evolve amid AI tooling, democratized practices, and shifting org structures, many experienced researchers are spending less time conducting studies—and more time enabling others to do it well. In complex environments like healthcare, the question is no longer whether research should happen continuously, but who does it, when it happens, and how “good” it needs to be to move the work forward. In this lightning talk, James Wieselman Schulman shares how he’s helped build a culture where research isn’t reserved for specialists, but embedded throughout design and delivery. Drawing from service and healthcare design, he explores how cross-functional teams can engage in research responsibly—without lowering standards or losing sight of ethics, rigor, and trust. You’ll hear practical examples of how to: Use research continuously—not just at the start—to shape workshops, prototypes, MVPs, and business decisions; create clear guardrails so non-researchers can conduct meaningful (even if imperfect) research and learn through doing; redefine research ROI around impact, learning velocity, and organizational confidence, not methodological perfection The opportunity isn’t to replace expertise, but to extend it. When expert researchers shift from gatekeepers to coaches, they raise the floor for everyone, protect what makes research human, and ensure empathy remains at the center of the work. This session is for researchers, designers, and leaders navigating the shift from research doer to research enabler. It offers a pragmatic, human-centered view of research—one where five good conversations can be better than none, learning happens through action, and advancing the work matters more than protecting the role.
Key Insights
-
•
Resource constraints require us to involve non-researchers in conducting and experiencing research.
-
•
Democratizing empathy means getting designers, engineers, and product owners closer to real users.
-
•
Palchinsky’s principles—novelty, survivability, and learnability—offer a useful lens for scaling empathy via research.
-
•
Novel experiences with user research can help non-experts develop human-centered mindsets despite imperfect methods.
-
•
Survivability means enabling experimentation that doesn’t threaten project budgets or organizational stability.
-
•
A small amount of imperfect research by partners still yields valuable learning and maintains overall ROI.
-
•
Learnability depends on creating feedback loops where researchers coach and mentor collaborators.
-
•
Repeated practice with scaled research tasks helps non-researchers gain skills without risking critical projects.
-
•
Empathy often emerges more from the experience of doing or observing research than from insights alone.
-
•
Researchers should become organizational thought leaders guiding when and how to involve others in research.
Notable Quotes
"We are asked to produce more and more work with fewer people and smaller teams."
"How might we democratize empathy at scale within our organizations?"
"The goal is not methodological perfection; empathy is the end game."
"Even bad research can be good because it creates learning opportunities."
"Ten interviews is enough to get most of the way to meaningful insights."
"Getting partners involved in research may mean accepting some imperfect interviews."
"Research is something that should happen throughout the process — early and often."
"The most transformative part of research is being involved in the work itself."
"You have to find ways for people to practice so they can learn without destroying projects."
"Researchers can become thought leaders by coaching and mentoring others on empathy and research."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If design, product, and development use different tools, we end up talking past one another."
Jon Fukuda Amy Evans Ignacio Martinez Joe MeersmanThe Big Question about Innovation: A Panel Discussion
September 25, 2024
"Diverse teams build diverse products."
Sam ProulxAccessibility: An Opportunity to Innovate
March 9, 2022
"Diversity is not just about how people look or sound, but also about their capabilities and their place on introversion-extraversion scales."
Anna Avrekh Amy Jiménez Márquez Morgan C. Ramsey Catarina TsangDiversity In and For Design: Building Conscious Diversity in Design and Research
June 9, 2021
"Hands-free control with bots is critical to avoid dangerous distractions, like driving."
Greg NudelmanDesigning Conversational Interfaces
November 14, 2019
"You get real coded components, not just HTML snippets or style attributes, meaning developers can drag, drop, and extend with hooks already in place."
George Abraham Stefan IvanovDesign Systems To-Go: Reimagining Developer Handoff, and Introducing App Builder (Part 2)
October 1, 2021
"Research insights should belong to the team, not just the researcher."
Shipra KayanMake your research synthesis speedy and more collaborative using a canvas
January 24, 2025
"If you’re designing a site used infrequently, don’t overload it with custom hotkeys that are hard to memorize."
Sam ProulxDesigning For Screen Readers: Understanding the Mental Models and Techniques of Real Users
December 10, 2021
"Ownership of VOC is a hot potato, so we built a coalition with a facilitator to keep it collaborative and effective."
Shipra KayanHow we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up
September 30, 2021
"For some users, AI products are not just tools, they are relationships."
Dane DeSutterKeeping the Body in Mind: What Gestures and Embodied Actions Tell You That Users May Not
March 26, 2024
