Shaping the Next Era of UX Research: Collaborative Forum
Summary
In this session, we’re not just discussing UX Research as it is—but would it could be. Taylor Klassman, Director of UX Research at Dscout, will lead an interactive exploration of bold “What If?” scenarios that challenge assumptions and open new possibilities for the future of our field. Framed around the Four Pillars of Controlling Our Destiny—Purpose, People, Process, and Progress, this session will tackle the evolving role of research amidst shifting budgets, AI-driven automation, and the increasing speed of decision-making. Through engaging discussions and Miro usage, we’ll explore how UX researchers can adapt to external forces or take control of our future.
Key Insights
-
•
UX research currently lives in tension between AI optimism and skepticism, reflecting deep uncertainty about automation's role.
-
•
Perceived value of research fluctuates; some feel devalued while others, like Robert, emphasize relational power to amplify impact.
-
•
Job market insecurity contrasts with investments in research operations maturation, creating complex career dynamics.
-
•
Scientific rigor often clashes with corporate decision-making realities, calling for adaptive research processes, as discussed by Julie and Kristen.
-
•
Remote environments challenge traditional methods of stakeholder engagement and relationship-building, reducing immersive experiences.
-
•
Visualizing research impact as an evolving story rather than static metrics (like CSAT) can better communicate progress over time.
-
•
The UX field is expanding and blending with other disciplines, causing identity tensions and pushback on role boundaries.
-
•
Democratizing research as a business skill can be beneficial but requires experts to maintain rigor and questionable findings.
-
•
Long game tactics, such as Trojan horse research, help practitioners create meaningful impact within organizational constraints.
-
•
Technology and design choices reflect embedded worldviews; UX professionals hold power to influence these decisions toward inclusivity.
Notable Quotes
"We have these four pillars—purpose, people, process, and progress—that ground our thinking about UX research's future."
"AI-driven results are often 30 to 50 percent hallucinogenic—meaning not real—so we need to be cautious about overreliance."
"Our truth is no longer singular; transparency and comprehensive storytelling are more important than ever in research."
"In a remote environment, building authentic, deep relationships with stakeholders is a key skill for researchers."
"Sometimes we have to do a bait and switch—meet organizational demands but turn that into opportunities to learn."
"Democratizing research is okay as long as we remain experts in rigorous methods and question questionable research kindly."
"We often adapt within imperfect systems rather than fight them outright, aiming for longer-term change."
"Impact of research is not always immediate or linear; it can be a long-term, complex process to measure."
"The UX field's expansion leads to pushback—people ask why researchers talk about areas owned by others like OCM."
"Technology is a series of choices designers and technologists make, often small but impactful; we must demand better choices that work for all of us."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Getting something accessible is a straight line; keeping something accessible requires process change."
Sheri Byrne-HaberAccessibility at Scale
June 9, 2021
"Design for emotion to create experiences that resonate beyond functionality."
Prayag Narula Hannah HudsonEmpowering Designers to do Good Research
March 11, 2022
"Don't be precious but don't be reckless either when opening research access to others."
Janelle EstesUX Research Trends
January 28, 2021
"We often get designed into a corner by trying to fix words at the end instead of involving content designers earlier."
Craig Brookes Andreas Huebner Morgan Quinn"Just Make it Look Good" and Other Ways We're Misunderstood
June 11, 2021
"We encourage one-to-one video calls to build rapport and feel comfortable reaching out for advice."
Marc Fonteijn Ru ButlerIncrease your confidence, influence, and impact (through a Professional Community)
December 3, 2024
"Designing the service so the team can be efficient and impactful is essential — otherwise you just move the inefficiency around."
Kate TowseyThe State of ResearchOps: More Than Just Theory
June 20, 2019
"When we’re not safe, our thinking brain — the neocortex — shuts down and operating IQ drops by half."
Alla WeinbergDesign Teams Need Psychological Safety: Here’s How to Create It
September 9, 2022
"A government designer aims to reduce UX variation while a contractor may optimize only their single product, creating potential conflicts."
Shawna Hein Kevin HoffmanCreate a Cohesive Civic Design Practice Across Agency, Vendors, and Contracts
November 17, 2022
"Positive mutual regard helps uncover root causes behind people’s behaviors to build collaboration rather than combat."
Tricia WangSCALE: Discussion
June 15, 2018
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How should communication style change when working with contractors compared to corporate colleagues?
What does the acquisition of User Interviews by UserTesting mean for participants and research ops teams?
How can measuring team behaviors instead of just results improve trust and performance in design ops?