A PM State of Mind: Empathy Mapping Your Product Manager, Pt. 1
Summary
Key Insights
-
•
Empathy mapping product managers helps align teams by walking in their shoes and understanding their external pressures.
-
•
Product managers often struggle with balancing executive goals and competing priorities without formal authority.
-
•
Framing product managers as pressured caretakers rather than blockers improves team dynamics.
-
•
Using live collaborative tools like Big Jump and Speak Jam enhances engagement during empathy exercises.
-
•
Capturing direct quotes for empathy maps—even assumed ones—adds specificity and clarity to personas.
-
•
Prioritization conflicts frequently arise because everyone wants something on the roadmap without considering trade-offs.
-
•
Segmenting planned work into exploratory research, validation, and small fixes helps manage risk and resource allocation.
-
•
Mapping what product managers see, say, do, and feel reveals tensions often invisible to their teams.
-
•
Incremental affinity mapping after sessions allows synthesis of collective insights for better decision-making.
-
•
Explicitly acknowledging the difficulty for product managers to influence without authority helps build empathy and collaboration.
Notable Quotes
"It’s important not to seek control but understanding."
"Product managers carry a lot of pressure and accountability without a lot of ability to force people to do anything."
"Everyone is trying to get something onto the roadmap without worrying about the impact on other priorities."
"This work does not fit our product program."
"We can imagine them worrying about managing competing priorities with product strategy execution."
"Capturing quotes directly—even assumed ones—makes empathy mapping more specific."
"During discovery, it’s important to identify which features require exploration versus those that just need validation or small fixes."
"Sometimes the solution is obvious and doesn’t need a lot of user research time."
"Grouping new features into buckets helps teams prepare for different types of product work appropriately."
"Empathizing with product managers is a great first step towards turning understanding into bigger influence for product and design."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Treat unemployment as a full-time job; be relentless and turn over every stone to improve your chances."
Corey LongHiring in DesignOps: A Critical Study on How to Hire and Get Hired
September 23, 2024
"Prototyping is not about usability, it’s about exploring the idea."
Gretchen AndersonScaling the Human Center
June 8, 2017
"We create the constraints that bring out the best from design teams. We are the enablers of weird."
Lori Muszynski Peter MerholzKeeping Design Weird
October 2, 2023
"Many magnification tools also have screen reader functions to reduce eye strain and help users."
Sam ProulxSUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
June 9, 2021
"It's important not to be a parachute researcher who just jumps in, asks questions, and jumps out without impact."
Prayag Narula Rida QadriHCI 2.0: Humanity Deserves the Attention that UX Research has to Offer
March 28, 2023
"Assessing feedback urgency means understanding if the issue blocks critical work or if there are workarounds."
Deanna SmithLeading Change with Confidence: Strategies for Optimizing Your Process
September 23, 2024
"A combination of push and pull communication strategies usually works best to share insights."
Lija HoganDoing more with more: Lessons from the Front Lines of Democratization
March 9, 2022
"There isn’t a time I can remember where there wasn’t a computer talking to me."
Sam ProulxTo Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility
March 11, 2022
"David Nicholson is the reason why you don’t have to write very fast."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
October 3, 2023
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What role do templates play in structuring research reports for better repository management and AI parsing?
How do I handle credibility challenges and emotional barriers when working with medical professionals?
How can researchers integrate multiple stakeholder perspectives into a coherent research narrative?