Rosenverse
Discussion

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Discussion

Gold
Wednesday, May 13, 2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Share the love for this talk
Discussion
Speakers: David Cronin , Uday Gajendar , Peter Morville and Kendra Shimmell
Link:

Summary

In this talk, the panelists explore how to identify critical inflection points in product development marked by growing complexity and user confusion, as highlighted by the consultant who often joins after chaos has emerged. Uday emphasizes the importance of aligning the highest representatives from marketing, engineering, and UX teams using the three-in-the-box model, supplemented by a wild card from orthogonal domains to spark innovation. Dave shares his traditional, people-first approach to understanding complex domains by deeply engaging with long-tenured subject matter experts. He details how his team manages their design system through enterprise agile practices, prioritizing impactful features and balancing stakeholder needs. Dave also addresses challenges like superficial adoption of design frameworks (IIDX washing) and stresses that their team invests more effort in facilitating workshops and teaching proper use of the system than just maintaining it, underscoring the synergy between conversations and prototyping tools for innovation.

Key Insights

  • Inflection points often become evident when users display confusion during usability testing, even with familiar tools.

  • Hiring an external consultant usually happens after an inflection point has caused chaos and complexity.

  • The three-in-the-box model—marketing, engineering, and UX leaders—is crucial for aligning diverse opinions around a common goal.

  • Introducing a ‘wild card’ from an orthogonal domain can spark innovative thinking in product teams.

  • Deep domain understanding comes from engaging with end users and long-tenured subject matter experts rather than relying solely on system mapping.

  • Design systems should be treated like living software products with backlogs, QA, and prioritized feature requests.

  • ‘IIDX washing’ occurs when teams superficially use a design framework to claim UX improvements without real change, which requires both confrontation and letting user adoption reveal the truth.

  • More effort is often spent teaching people how to use design systems effectively than on maintaining the systems themselves.

  • Combining creative workshops with prototyping tools accelerates feedback cycles and innovation.

  • In large ecosystems with many developers, contextual understanding is key to selecting the appropriate design components or 'LEGOs'.

Notable Quotes

"One sign of evidence that you've passed an inflection point is when you hire me as a consultant."

"When I see users saying, oh my goodness, I didn’t know it did that, that’s a clear sign of too much complexity."

"The three-in-the-box model means having marketing, engineering, and UX leaders working collaboratively."

"I always like to try to introduce a wild card from a slightly orthogonal field to spark the thinking."

"I start by going and talking to the people, the end users, and the subject matter experts who have been working in the field for decades."

"We treat the design system like a software product with a backlog, QA, and a product owner prioritizing feature requests."

"IIDX washing is when people replicate button by button and checkbox by checkbox, then claim better UX."

"Usually, the users not adopting the product alerts the organization that deeper issues exist beyond UI."

"We’ve put much more effort into workshop facilitation and teaching how to use the space effectively than on the design system itself."

"Creative conversations combined with material for quick prototyping let you get fast feedback on messy whiteboard ideas."

Ask the Rosenbot
Satyam Kantamneni
Do You Have an Experience Vision?
2023 • Enterprise Community
Shahrzad Samadzadeh
What Is My Value? Two Takes and Some Mistakes
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Renee Reid
Becoming a ResearchH.E.R (Highly Enterprise Ready)
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Kristin Skinner
Theme 1 Intro
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Dr. Jamika D. Burge
Theme 3 Intro
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Maverick Chan
From Doodle to Demo: AI as Our Storytelling Partner
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Ron Bronson
Design, Consequences & Everyday Life
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Peter Morville
The Architecture of Understanding
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Ben Reason
Making the system visible: The fastest path to better decisions
2025 • Advancing Service Design 2025
Gold
Kevin M. Hoffman
Theme 2: Enterprise Team Journey
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Mike Brzozowski
UX in everyday products: Empowering climate conscious choices
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group
Dan Hill
Strategic design, slowdown, and the infrastructures of everyday life
2022 • Enterprise Community
Llewyn Paine
Day 1 Using AI in UX with Impact
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Nathan Curtis
Discussion
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Suzan Bednarz
AccessibilityOps for All
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
James Chudley
Decarbonising User Journeys: How minimising enables us to do more with less
2025 • Climate UX Interest Group

More Videos

Nathan Shedroff

"Design schools are often governed by non-designers and are surprisingly conservative, slow to change, and sometimes exploit precarious gig workers."

Nathan Shedroff Hugh Dubberly Thomas J. McLeish

How Will Design be Taught When the Schools Shut Down?

May 8, 2026

John Paul de Guzman

"We can forecast delivery dates despite shifting and volatile project conditions with 95% efficiency."

John Paul de Guzman

10k Screens Later: How We Became a Data-Driven Design Organization

September 24, 2024

Aleksandra Korczynska

"There are over five hundred tools that call themselves survey software on G2, making it one of the largest software categories."

Aleksandra Korczynska Caroline Jarrett Justyna Parmee

Survey Tools

March 12, 2026

Kristin Skinner

"How might your team maintain its resilience through constant change?"

Kristin Skinner

Theme 2: Introduction and Provocation

January 8, 2024

Rachael Dietkus, LCSW

"You are allowed to say white supremacy culture here, even if you can’t say that in your day-to-day work."

Rachael Dietkus, LCSW Victor Udoewa Jennifer Strickland

Everything You Need to Know about the Civic Design 2022 Call for Presentations

May 17, 2022

Uday Gajendar

"To do this work, you can’t do it with a JIRA ticket."

Uday Gajendar

The Rise of Meta-Design: A Starter Playbook

May 19, 2022

Vanessa Varin

"Match the moment. Calibrate the altitude and the type of feedback to the context."

Vanessa Varin

Feedback: The Other F-Word

September 10, 2025

Hugh Dubberly

"The average car today has 60 to 100 sensors generating a terrifying amount of data that will increasingly make its way to the cloud."

Hugh Dubberly

Problems with Problems: Reconsidering the Frame of Designing as Problem-Solving

June 19, 2019

Sean McKay

"Leading the future of research isn’t about control, it’s about influence and impact."

Sean McKay

Coexisting with non-researchers: Practical strategies for a democratized research future

March 11, 2025