Inclusive Research: Debunking Myths and Getting Started
Summary
Ever heard that accessibility research is too expensive? Too time-consuming? Or that you need a massive sample size to see real insights? These misconceptions stop too many UX researchers from taking the first step toward inclusive design. But here’s the truth: accessibility research is often simpler, faster, and more impactful than you think. In this interactive session, Samuel Proulx, Accessibility Evangelist at Fable, will demonstrate the actual reality behind the biggest myths that hold teams back, through a hands-on look at what accessibility research actually looks like. You’ll experience a real research interview with an assistive technology user and gain practical insights into how Fable’s UX researchers prepare for and conduct accessibility studies. By the end of this session, you’ll see that getting started doesn’t require a huge budget, complex logistics, or a massive sample size, just the willingness to take the first step. Join us to demystify accessibility research and leave empowered to integrate it into your own work.
Key Insights
-
•
Heading structure is critical for screen reader users to orient themselves, as headings act like a table of contents.
-
•
Screen reader users rely heavily on detailed alt text and product descriptions to understand items, especially for complex products like spices.
-
•
Hover menus are often inaccessible because keyboard and screen reader users cannot reveal submenu items that appear only on mouse hover.
-
•
Effective accessibility research requires participants who talk aloud and verbalize their screen reader interactions to provide clear feedback.
-
•
Researchers need training to avoid interrupting or overlapping with screen reader voices during live sessions.
-
•
There must be flexibility in research sessions to respond to participant distress or usability roadblocks instead of rigidly following scripts.
-
•
A robotic, high-speed screen reader voice is preferred by blind users for faster content consumption compared to natural-sounding voices.
-
•
Fable offers a subscription-based platform that streamlines recruiting screen reader users for ongoing accessibility research with quick turnaround.
-
•
Verbal confirmations from researchers during sessions validate participant input without disrupting their navigation or flow.
-
•
Building rapport and a relaxed atmosphere helps ease participants’ frustrations and encourages honest, valuable feedback.
Notable Quotes
"I kind of use headings to get an overview of what's on a page, like a table of contents."
"When I pressed enter it said product added to cart, but I had to check if it was actually the right product."
"Ideally it should say about collapsed and then you press enter and it says expanded, so you know more options are available."
"I use a very robotic kind of unnatural sounding voice because I want to listen as fast as possible for efficiency."
"Participants who do this kind of research are happy to answer questions about how they use assistive technology."
"You have to avoid speaking when the screen reader is speaking, which takes some training to get used to."
"If distress does happen in sessions, it’s easier to talk through it using humor or a personable approach."
"Hover menus reveal options on mouse hover, which isn't accessible to keyboard or screen reader users."
"Not every task has to be completed; if a participant can’t find a way, that means the experience can be improved."
"Ongoing accessibility research is essential because the product is always changing, and new things always need testing."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The outcome of this method really makes the difference between lightning and a lightning bug."
Anne MamaghaniHow Your Organization's Generative Workshops Are Probably Going Wrong and How to Get Them Right
March 28, 2023
"The real breakthrough was when the pilgrim’s mechanical bird spoke both ways, braiding their words together to reach the summit."
Kurt McCullochFaster alone, further together: Rebuilding collaboration in the age of AI research
March 10, 2026
"Children are advanced in design topics like UX because they see them in their everyday apps and games."
Sofía Delsordo Kassim VeraPublic Policy for Jalisco's Designers to Make Design Matter
December 8, 2021
"I myself career-wise went over to the dark side and became a product manager."
Christian CrumlishIntroduction by our Conference Chair
December 6, 2022
"Designers should not be left to figure things out alone as we grow faster."
Ebru NamaldiDesigning the Designer’s Journey: Scaling Teams, Culture, and Growth Through DesignOps
September 11, 2025
"Designers are uniquely entitled to critique—it’s a privilege to rigorously improve craft while others might envy that process."
Joseph MeersmanSweating the Pixel: Scaling Quality through Critique
June 10, 2021
"Our clients all have innovation portfolios, but if you zoom out, it's many micro decisions over time that are often opportunistic, lacking strategic connection."
Milan Guenther Benjamin KumpfThe $212 billion ‘so what?’: unlocking impact in development cooperation
November 20, 2025
"Democratization can be used arrogantly if we just let others do research so we can pick what’s fun for ourselves — Jared Spool."
Kathleen AsjesResearch Democratization: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
March 10, 2022
"We can’t design for every possible outcome anymore. We have to anticipate fuzzy ranges of results and channel behavior accordingly."
Josh Clark Veronika KindredSentient Design, AI, and the Radically Adaptive Experience (1st of 3 seminars)
January 15, 2025
