Rosenverse

Inclusive Research: Debunking Myths and Getting Started

Gold
Wednesday, March 12, 2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Share the love for this talk
Inclusive Research: Debunking Myths and Getting Started
Speakers: Samuel Proulx and Laur Baek
Link:

Summary

Ever heard that accessibility research is too expensive? Too time-consuming? Or that you need a massive sample size to see real insights? These misconceptions stop too many UX researchers from taking the first step toward inclusive design. But here’s the truth: accessibility research is often simpler, faster, and more impactful than you think.
In this interactive session, Samuel Proulx, Accessibility Evangelist at Fable, will demonstrate the actual reality behind the biggest myths that hold teams back, through a hands-on look at what accessibility research actually looks like. You’ll experience a real research interview with an assistive technology user and gain practical insights into how Fable’s UX researchers prepare for and conduct accessibility studies.

By the end of this session, you’ll see that getting started doesn’t require a huge budget, complex logistics, or a massive sample size, just the willingness to take the first step. Join us to demystify accessibility research and leave empowered to integrate it into your own work.

Key Insights

  • •

    Heading structure is critical for screen reader users to orient themselves, as headings act like a table of contents.

  • •

    Screen reader users rely heavily on detailed alt text and product descriptions to understand items, especially for complex products like spices.

  • •

    Hover menus are often inaccessible because keyboard and screen reader users cannot reveal submenu items that appear only on mouse hover.

  • •

    Effective accessibility research requires participants who talk aloud and verbalize their screen reader interactions to provide clear feedback.

  • •

    Researchers need training to avoid interrupting or overlapping with screen reader voices during live sessions.

  • •

    There must be flexibility in research sessions to respond to participant distress or usability roadblocks instead of rigidly following scripts.

  • •

    A robotic, high-speed screen reader voice is preferred by blind users for faster content consumption compared to natural-sounding voices.

  • •

    Fable offers a subscription-based platform that streamlines recruiting screen reader users for ongoing accessibility research with quick turnaround.

  • •

    Verbal confirmations from researchers during sessions validate participant input without disrupting their navigation or flow.

  • •

    Building rapport and a relaxed atmosphere helps ease participants’ frustrations and encourages honest, valuable feedback.

Notable Quotes

"I kind of use headings to get an overview of what's on a page, like a table of contents."

"When I pressed enter it said product added to cart, but I had to check if it was actually the right product."

"Ideally it should say about collapsed and then you press enter and it says expanded, so you know more options are available."

"I use a very robotic kind of unnatural sounding voice because I want to listen as fast as possible for efficiency."

"Participants who do this kind of research are happy to answer questions about how they use assistive technology."

"You have to avoid speaking when the screen reader is speaking, which takes some training to get used to."

"If distress does happen in sessions, it’s easier to talk through it using humor or a personable approach."

"Hover menus reveal options on mouse hover, which isn't accessible to keyboard or screen reader users."

"Not every task has to be completed; if a participant can’t find a way, that means the experience can be improved."

"Ongoing accessibility research is essential because the product is always changing, and new things always need testing."

Ask the Rosenbot
Nick Cochran
Growing in Enterprise Design through Making Connections
2019 • Enterprise Community
Brigette Metzler
Research Repositories: A global project by the ResearchOps Community
2020 • Advancing Research Community
Dave Hoffer
UX Job Search AMA #3 with Joanne Weaver and Dave Hoffer
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Niko Laitinen
Adaptable Org Design for Resilient Times
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Dharani Perera
The mandala of service design: unlocking alignment and action through service design
2025 • Advancing Service Design 2025
Gold
Uday Gajendar
Day 1 Welcome
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Marjorie Stainback
Transforming Strategic Research Capacity through Democratization
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Alla Weinberg
Workers Are Sick of Change: The Cure is Psychological Safety
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Jon Fukuda
Theme One Intro
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Doug Powell
Closing Keynote: Design at Scale
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Sam Proulx
Mobile Accessibility: Why Moving Accessibility Beyond the Desktop is Critical in a Mobile-first World
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Susan Weinschenk
Evaluating the Maturity of UX in Your Organization
2020 • Enterprise Community
Daniel Korczynski
From generic to contextual research insights with AI | Live Q&A
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Lily Aduana
5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
John Devanney
The Design Management Office
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold
Kate Towsey
Participant Recruitment and Management Tools
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold

More Videos

Mark Interrante

"The challenge of prioritization increases when decisions are adaptive, systemic, and dynamic."

Mark Interrante Harry Max

AI for Prioritization (3rd of 3 seminars)

July 11, 2024

Patrizia Bertini

"Building product today is getting more and more complex, and organizations desperately need professionals who speak compliance and product."

Patrizia Bertini

The (r)evolution of designOps: It’s Time to Think (really) BIG

September 11, 2025

Shan Shen

"The phrase card sort may not require translation itself, but the activity it represents certainly does."

Shan Shen

Translating UX Terms into Business Contexts

November 29, 2023

Adam Thomas

"You have to ask, what are we deciding, and what are we quitting, on a regular basis."

Adam Thomas

Survival Metrics – Making Change in a Fast, Data-Informed, and Politically Safe Way

December 6, 2022

Robin Beers

"Research really is the most predictive practice an organization has — we are the only ones who can really predict the future."

Robin Beers

Research as a Catalyst for Organizational Transformation

March 12, 2021

Sheri Byrne-Haber

"You want to catch accessibility defects early through automated testing in your CI/CD pipeline, what we call shifting left."

Sheri Byrne-Haber

Accessibility at Scale

June 9, 2021

Joseph Meersman

"Design shares are more about presenting finished work and practice defending it, not about peer-to-peer feedback."

Joseph Meersman

Sweating the Pixel: Scaling Quality through Critique

June 10, 2021

Deanna Washington

"You gotta write that charter to get clarity with your team."

Deanna Washington Bria Alexander Jon Fukuda Saara Kamppari-Miller Farid Sabitov

Connecting the Ops: Plenary Panel and Closing Circle

September 9, 2022

Aaron Stienstra

"Iterative engagement models mean we test, learn, and adapt rather than seeking a perfect solution from the start."

Aaron Stienstra Lashanda Hodge

Leveraging Civic Design to Advance Equity and Rebuild Trust in the US Federal Government

December 8, 2021